Css 2019

September 2025

CSS 2019 – Pakistan Affairs: Examiner’s Feedback and Student Guide

CSS 2019 – Pakistan Affairs: Examiner’s Feedback and Student Guide Introduction Pakistan Affairs is a compulsory paper that checks your grasp of historical foundations, ideological basis, constitutional development, and contemporary challenges of Pakistan. It requires both historical knowledge and analytical writing. The examiner’s report for CE-2019 revealed that most candidates relied too much on rote learning and superficial notes, which resulted in below-average performance. Let’s break down the examiner’s insights, mistakes, and preparation strategies. Examiner Feedback (2019) The examiner observed: Performance was largely disappointing. Many candidates showed limited understanding of Pakistan Movement and ideological foundations. A large number focused only on post-1947 issues, ignoring pre-partition developments. Answers were descriptive, repetitive, and poorly structured, with little analysis. Candidates failed to connect historical context with current national issues like governance, extremism, federalism, or foreign policy. English expression was often weak and examiner-unfriendly. A few well-prepared candidates who linked history to contemporary Pakistan performed far better【Examiner-Reports-CE-2019.pdf†L65-L72】. Common Mistakes by Candidates Neglect of pre-partition history Ignoring key figures, reform movements, and events before 1947. Narration instead of analysis Writing long stories of events without explaining causes, impacts, or lessons. Weak ideological foundation Confusion about the Two-Nation Theory, Allama Iqbal’s vision, and Quaid’s ideology. Over-reliance on notes Many reproduced stereotypical content from academies. Poor linkage with current issues Candidates failed to connect constitutional development, political instability, or governance crises to Pakistan’s present challenges. Weak English Grammar, coherence, and organization issues were widespread. Practical Preparation Strategies Cover syllabus holistically Pre-1857: Reform movements, Sir Syed, Aligarh Movement. 1857–1947: Muslim nationalism, Allama Iqbal’s role, Quaid’s leadership, Pakistan Movement. Post-1947: Constitution-making, federalism, military interventions, democracy, economy, foreign policy. Focus on ideology Master the philosophical and practical foundations of Pakistan (Two-Nation Theory, Islam’s role, constitutional debates). Analyze, don’t narrate Instead of just stating “Ayub Khan imposed Martial Law,” analyze why, its impact on institutions, and what lessons it carries. Link history with present Always connect past issues with today’s challenges (e.g., federalism → 18th Amendment, Kashmir → current foreign policy). Use authentic sources Books by Ikram Rabbani, K.K. Aziz, Stanley Wolpert, and research articles on Pakistan’s politics and history. Organize answers with clarity Intro → historical background → analysis → lessons/way forward. Practice analytical writing Attempt past paper questions under exam conditions. Encouraging Closing Note The CSS 2019 examiner’s report makes one thing clear: Pakistan Affairs is not a story-writing paper. It requires analysis, clarity, and the ability to connect history with current realities. Those who relied on rote memorization lost marks, while those who combined historical knowledge with critical thinking performed well. Remember: Every historical event is a lesson for today’s Pakistan. Highlight those lessons, and you will impress the examiner. Stay motivated: by mastering Pakistan Affairs, you not only score better but also understand your country more deeply — a vital trait for a future policymaker. Back to Blog Page . .

CSS 2019 – Pakistan Affairs: Examiner’s Feedback and Student Guide Read More »

CSS 2019 – Islamic Studies: Examiner’s Feedback and Student Guide

Introduction

Islamic Studies is a compulsory paper in CSS that requires candidates to balance religious knowledge, analytical skills, and contemporary application. It is not about rote learning but about demonstrating an understanding of Islam’s principles and …

CSS 2019 – Islamic Studies: Examiner’s Feedback and Student Guide Read More »

CSS 2019 – English (Précis & Composition): Examiner’s Feedback and Student Guide

CSS 2019 – English (Précis & Composition): Examiner’s Feedback and Student Guide CSS English CSS English CSS English CSS English . . Introduction English (Précis & Composition) is the CSS paper that consistently filters out the majority of aspirants. It is not only about comprehension but also about clarity, grammar, vocabulary, and concise writing. The examiner’s report for CE-2019 showed that while a handful of candidates demonstrated competence, the vast majority struggled with basics. Poor grammar, weak précis writing, and irrelevant answers made this one of the lowest-scoring compulsory papers once again. Examiner Feedback (2019) The examiner observed: Performance was extremely poor overall. Most candidates could not write a proper précis — they either copied chunks of the passage or added irrelevant details. Grammar and vocabulary weaknesses were widespread, with basic errors in tenses, punctuation, and sentence structure. Many wrote in a casual style, ignoring the need for formal, precise English. Answers to comprehension and grammar exercises were vague, unfocused, and often incorrect. Some candidates wrote irrelevantly just to fill space, rather than addressing the question directly【Examiner-Reports-CE-2019.pdf†L35-L46】. Common Mistakes by Candidates Weak précis writing Candidates failed to capture the central idea in one-third length and often included their own opinions. Grammar and syntax errors Misuse of tenses, articles, and subject-verb agreement was common. Casual language Instead of formal English, some wrote in an informal or conversational tone. Irrelevant or vague answers Especially in comprehension and short-answer sections, candidates wasted time with unrelated material. Poor vocabulary Many lacked synonyms and antonyms for simple words. Untidy presentation Lack of neatness and scattered answers made it hard for examiners to follow. Practical Preparation Strategies Practice précis daily Summarize editorials or articles in one-third length. Always write in the third person and past tense. Work on grammar basics Focus on tenses, punctuation, articles, prepositions, and subject-verb agreement. Books like Wren & Martin or Practical English Grammar by Thomson & Martinet are useful. Expand vocabulary Read English newspapers and note synonyms/antonyms. Apps like Vocabulary.com can also help. Comprehension practice Solve past CSS comprehension questions. Practice writing short, clear answers in your own words. Stay formal and concise Avoid casual or lengthy answers. Precision is key. Organize answers neatly Use headings or numbering where appropriate. Keep your writing examiner-friendly. Get feedback Have your précis and grammar exercises checked by a mentor or peer to catch recurring errors. Encouraging Closing Note The CSS 2019 report makes it clear: most candidates lost this paper because they ignored the basics. Précis writing is an art of brevity, clarity, and precision — and grammar is about discipline. Both can be mastered with steady practice. Remember: You don’t need to be an English literature expert to clear this paper. You need to be clear, correct, and concise. With consistent practice in précis, grammar, and comprehension, you can turn this filter paper into a scoring subject. Stay motivated: every passage you summarize, every grammar mistake you correct, every new word you learn brings you closer to success. Approach it seriously, and you will stand out among the crowd. Learn More about css

CSS 2019 – English (Précis & Composition): Examiner’s Feedback and Student Guide Read More »

CSS 2019 – General Science & Ability (GSA): Examiner’s Feedback and Student Guide

CSS 2019 – General Science & Ability (GSA): Examiner’s Feedback and Student Guide CSS 2019 CSS 2019 CSS 2019 CSS 2019 . . Introduction General Science & Ability (GSA) is one of the most balanced compulsory papers in CSS. It checks not only your awareness of everyday science but also your skills in basic mathematics, logical reasoning, and analytical problem-solving. Many aspirants consider it a scoring paper, yet the examiner’s report for CE-2019 revealed that a large number of candidates underperformed. Weak conceptual preparation, careless mistakes, and poor presentation cost them valuable marks. Let’s explore what examiners highlighted, common mistakes, and strategies to master this paper. Examiner Feedback (2019) The examiner observed: Overall performance was below expectations. Many candidates attempted the paper in a casual and careless manner, ignoring accuracy and neatness. Basic science concepts (e.g., human physiology, environmental issues, space science) were poorly understood. The analytical reasoning and mathematics section was especially challenging for most; many left these questions blank. Instead of giving precise answers, aspirants often wrote irrelevant or long, descriptive content. Few used diagrams, tables, or formulas even when they could have made answers clearer【Examiner-Reports-CE-2019.pdf†L47-L55】. Common Mistakes by Candidates Weak basics of science Candidates failed to explain simple concepts like greenhouse effect, blood circulation, or photosynthesis. Poor math skills Many struggled with basic percentages, ratios, and probability questions. Skipping reasoning questions Instead of attempting, candidates left logical puzzles blank, showing lack of practice. Over-explaining Instead of concise answers, aspirants filled pages with irrelevant details. Lack of visuals Very few used diagrams, charts, or labeled sketches, which could have earned easy marks. Untidy presentation Scattered answers across the paper confused examiners. Practical Preparation Strategies Strengthen scientific basics Revise matric/O-level level Physics, Chemistry, and Biology. Focus on human body systems, environmental science, space science, and energy resources. Practice mathematics daily Work on arithmetic, algebra, percentages, ratios, averages, and probability. Use past CSS papers and aptitude books. Sharpen reasoning skills Solve puzzles, analogies, series completion, and logic questions. Regular practice builds speed. Use diagrams and visuals Draw neat diagrams for processes like water cycle, blood circulation, or solar system. Simple visuals make answers examiner-friendly. Be precise Write short, to-the-point answers. Avoid unnecessary explanations. Mock practice Attempt full-length past papers in exam conditions to improve time management and presentation. Encouraging Closing Note The CSS 2019 examiner’s report confirms that GSA is a scoring paper if taken seriously. Those who ignored preparation or treated it casually lost marks, while those who revised basics and practiced problem-solving did well. Remember: This paper rewards clarity, accuracy, and neatness. Every formula you practice, every diagram you draw, every logical puzzle you solve builds confidence. Approach it methodically, and you can easily make GSA a high-scoring advantage in your CSS attempt. Stay consistent: science and math are all about practice. With patience and discipline, you can turn this compulsory paper into one of your strongest.

CSS 2019 – General Science & Ability (GSA): Examiner’s Feedback and Student Guide Read More »

CSS 2019 – Current Affairs: Css Examiner’s Feedback and Student Guide

CSS 2019 – Current Affairs: Css Examiner Feedback and Student Guide Css Examiner Css Examiner Css Examiner Css Examiner  . . Introduction Current Affairs (CA) is a decisive paper in CSS because it measures not just your knowledge of global and national issues, but also your ability to analyze, organize, and present arguments clearly. Unfortunately, the examiner’s report for CE-2019 revealed that while some candidates had surface-level awareness, most lacked depth, analysis, and strong English writing. This led to disappointing results. Let’s unpack the examiner’s insights, the common mistakes aspirants made, and practical strategies to help you excel in CA. Examiner Feedback (2019) The examiner noted: Overall performance was unsatisfactory. Candidates had limited awareness of contemporary international and national issues. Many attempted questions with shallow, descriptive answers rather than analytical responses. Facts, figures, and references were largely missing — answers lacked credibility. Candidates depended too much on Pakistani newspapers, ignoring global perspectives. Poor English grammar and unstructured writing further hurt the quality of answers. A handful of candidates who used multi-dimensional analysis (political, economic, social, security) and included data/reports stood out and scored well【Examiner-Reports-CE-2019.pdf†L56-L64】. Common Mistakes by Candidates Narration instead of analysis Many wrote essays on issues (like Kashmir, climate change, CPEC) without analyzing causes, impacts, and possible solutions. No use of facts and references Candidates gave opinions without backing them with statistics, UN/World Bank reports, or constitutional references. Over-reliance on local sources Depending only on Pakistani media limited answers to one-sided viewpoints. Weak English expression Poor grammar and weak structure made even good ideas lose value. Poor question analysis Many misunderstood or ignored the exact demand of the question. Practical Preparation Strategies Develop issue-based notes For every major issue (terrorism, climate change, US-China rivalry, Pakistan-India relations, Middle East conflicts, economy), prepare notes with: Background Current status Causes and challenges Impacts (global & Pakistan-specific) Way forward/solutions Use multiple sources Read Dawn, Business Recorder (local) + The Guardian, The Diplomat, Foreign Affairs (global). Follow reports by UNDP, IMF, World Bank, Amnesty International. Incorporate data and reports Example: quoting Pakistan’s Human Development Index ranking, FATF requirements, or UN climate change reports adds weight. Adopt multi-dimensional analysis Political, economic, social, security, and environmental perspectives should all be covered where relevant. Practice analytical writing Write answers to past CA questions under timed conditions. Focus on clarity, structure, and relevance. Improve English expression Practice writing short analytical paragraphs daily. Clarity > verbosity. Encouraging Closing Note The CSS 2019 examiner’s report is a wake-up call: Current Affairs is not about writing everything you know — it’s about writing what matters in a structured, analytical way. Those who added depth, facts, and balance performed well, while those who relied on narrative writing failed. Remember: Current Affairs is not just a subject — it’s the lens through which examiners judge your suitability as a policymaker. If you build analytical skills, stay updated, and practice structured writing, you can transform CA from a hurdle into a scoring advantage. Stay motivated: every article you read, every analysis you practice, every report you cite takes you closer to mastering this subject. Approach it seriously, and you will shine.

CSS 2019 – Current Affairs: Css Examiner’s Feedback and Student Guide Read More »

CSS 2019 – English Essay: Examiner’s Feedback and Student Guide

CSS 2019 – English Essay: Examiner’s Feedback and Student Guide CSS Essay CSS Essay CSS Essay CSS Essay CSS Essay  . . Introduction The English Essay is the most feared paper in CSS. It not only tests your command of English but also your ability to think critically, structure arguments, and write persuasively. In CE-2019, the essay paper once again proved to be a nightmare for many aspirants. The examiner’s report shows that while a handful wrote good essays, the majority failed due to lack of planning, poor language, and superficial content. Let’s unpack what went wrong, the examiner’s observations, and how you can prepare to make the essay your strength. Examiner Feedback (2019) The examiner noted the following: Failure rate was extremely high. Most candidates could not produce a structured, coherent essay. Many lacked the ability to differentiate between an essay and a general answer. Instead of presenting arguments around a thesis, they wrote descriptive narratives. Weak outlines were a major problem — candidates listed headings without developing them in the essay. Essays were full of irrelevant, repetitive content with little focus on the actual topic. Candidates showed weak grammar, spelling, and vocabulary, which ruined even good ideas. A few candidates who demonstrated clarity of thought, originality, and structured arguments wrote excellent essays and stood out【Examiner-Reports-CE-2019.pdf†L20-L32】. Common Mistakes by Candidates No clear thesis statement Essays lacked a central argument or stance. Poor outlines Outlines were vague lists of headings that did not match the essay body. Over-generalized content Instead of focusing on the topic, many wrote broad discussions without relevance. Weak introduction and conclusion Many started abruptly without introducing the topic and ended without a proper conclusion. Language and grammar errors Frequent mistakes in sentence construction, tenses, and spelling. Over-reliance on memorized material Essays on topics like democracy, CPEC, or terrorism were often copied from notes. Practical Preparation Strategies Understand the nature of an essay It’s not about writing everything you know — it’s about building an argument around a thesis. Practice outlines regularly Before writing, make outlines that are logical and connected to the thesis. Ensure the essay follows the outline. Write full essays under timed conditions At least one essay per week. Practice 1500–2000 words with 30–40 minutes spent on planning. Improve language skills Revise grammar basics and practice writing clear, concise sentences. Reading good newspapers and journals will naturally improve style. Focus on critical analysis Always look at both sides of an issue before presenting your stance. Example: In an essay on globalization, discuss both benefits and challenges before giving a way forward. Stay updated with facts and examples Use data, quotations, and current affairs to strengthen your arguments. Seek feedback Get your essays checked by mentors or peers. Constructive criticism will help you fix recurring mistakes. Encouraging Closing Note The CSS 2019 examiner’s report confirms what we already know: the essay paper is a test of clarity, analysis, and expression. Memorization won’t work here. Those who wrote with original thought, structured outlines, and simple, correct English succeeded, while others failed. Remember: Essay writing is a skill — and like any skill, it improves with practice. Each outline you prepare, each essay you write, takes you one step closer to mastery. With consistency and patience, you can turn this daunting paper into an opportunity to showcase your thinking power. Stay motivated: you don’t need to be Shakespeare — you just need to be clear, logical, and persuasive. The examiner is looking for thinkers, not note-repeaters. Be that thinker, and you will shine.

CSS 2019 – English Essay: Examiner’s Feedback and Student Guide Read More »

CSS 2019 – Zoology: Examiner’s Feedback and Student Guide

CSS 2019 – Zoology: Examiner’s Feedback and Student Guide . . CSS Zoology CSS Zoology CSS Zoology CSS Zoology CSS Zoology CSS Zoology  Introduction Zoology is a science-based optional that attracts candidates with backgrounds in biology, medicine, or natural sciences. It is considered a manageable subject because of its defined syllabus and reliance on diagrams and scientific clarity. However, the examiner’s report for CE-2019 revealed that most candidates underperformed due to weak concepts, rote preparation, and poor use of visuals. Examiner Feedback (2019) The examiner noted: Overall performance was disappointing. Many candidates lacked conceptual understanding of core topics like genetics, physiology, taxonomy, and ecology. Answers were often descriptive and bookish, without scientific reasoning. Diagrams and flowcharts were missing or poorly drawn, reducing marks. Candidates ignored applied aspects of zoology, such as biodiversity conservation and role in agriculture/medicine. A few well-prepared candidates who used neat diagrams, case studies, and scientific explanations scored well【Examiner-Reports-CE-2019.pdf†L261-L268】. Common Mistakes by Candidates Weak grasp of core topics Poor explanations of genetics, developmental biology, and animal physiology. Narrative answers Writing descriptive essays instead of analytical, scientific answers. Neglect of diagrams Many skipped drawing structures (e.g., animal tissues, systems), losing easy marks. No application to Pakistan Ignoring Pakistan’s biodiversity, endangered species, or ecological challenges. Selective preparation Avoiding tough topics like chordates or applied zoology. Practical Preparation Strategies Revise core zoology systematically Cell biology, genetics, embryology, physiology, taxonomy, ecology, applied zoology. Use diagrams effectively Neat, labeled sketches of tissues, organs, life cycles, and ecological pyramids. Link with applied aspects Biodiversity conservation in Pakistan, wildlife management, zoonotic diseases, fisheries, livestock. Adopt a scientific approach Define → explain process → diagram → application → conclusion. Avoid rote learning Focus on understanding concepts and processes instead of memorizing definitions. Use authentic references E.P. Solomon – Biology Miller & Harley – Zoology Pakistani biodiversity reports for local examples. Practice past papers Write answers under exam conditions using structured outlines. Encouraging Closing Note The CSS 2019 examiner’s report shows that Zoology rewards clarity, diagrams, and scientific application. Candidates who memorized notes without understanding concepts failed, while those who combined knowledge with visuals and applied examples scored well. Remember: Zoology is about explaining life scientifically. Every diagram you draw, every concept you clarify, every biodiversity example you use makes your preparation stronger. Stay motivated: Zoology can be one of your highest-scoring optionals if you approach it with scientific clarity and examiner-friendly presentation.

CSS 2019 – Zoology: Examiner’s Feedback and Student Guide Read More »

CSS 2019 – Urdu Literature: Examiner’s Feedback and Student Guide

CSS 2019 – Urdu Literature: Examiner’s Feedback and Student Guide CSS Urdu CSS Urdu CSS Urdu CSS Urdu CSS Urdu  . . Introduction Urdu Literature is a selective optional in CSS, usually chosen by candidates with strong command of Urdu or those with a background in literature. It is considered a rewarding subject for those who can combine literary appreciation, critical analysis, and historical context. However, the examiner’s report for CE-2019 showed that most candidates underperformed because they relied on rote learning, ignored literary criticism, and failed to structure their answers academically. Examiner Feedback (2019) The examiner observed: Overall performance was below average. Many candidates reproduced memorized notes instead of presenting critical and original analysis. Answers lacked historical and literary context, with candidates failing to situate authors and poets within their times. Literary criticism and evaluation of texts were mostly missing. Many answers were narrative and descriptive, not analytical. Only a few well-prepared candidates who used references, criticism, and structured writing scored well【Examiner-Reports-CE-2019.pdf†L254-L260】. Common Mistakes by Candidates Over-reliance on rote material Writing “what they remembered” instead of engaging critically with texts. Neglect of literary criticism Few cited critics like Shibli Nomani, Hali, Dr. Jameel Jalibi, or Intizar Hussain. Weak historical/literary context Ignoring how political, cultural, or social conditions shaped literary works. Narrative writing Describing poets’ biographies instead of analyzing themes, styles, and contributions. Poor organization Lack of headings, outlines, or examiner-friendly presentation. Practical Preparation Strategies Study history of Urdu literature From classical poetry (Mir, Ghalib) to modern prose (Prem Chand, Qurat-ul-Ain Hyder) and contemporary trends. Use literary criticism Reference critics and analytical works: Shibli Nomani’s Sher-ul-Ajam, Hali’s Muqaddama-e-Sher-o-Shaeri, Dr. Jameel Jalibi’s Tareekh-e-Adab-e-Urdu. Analyze, don’t narrate Instead of biography, focus on themes, stylistics, philosophical ideas, and socio-political impact. Cover all genres Poetry (ghazal, nazm, marsiya), prose (novels, short stories, essays, drama), and criticism. Incorporate context Connect literature with historical movements: Aligarh Movement, Progressive Writers Movement, Partition literature, post-modernism. Organize answers academically Intro → author/work → literary analysis → critical view → conclusion. Read authentic references Dr. Jameel Jalibi, Dr. Saleem Akhtar, Farman Fatehpuri, Muhammad Hasan Askari. Encouraging Closing Note The CSS 2019 examiner’s report confirms that Urdu Literature rewards critical analysis, not memorization. Candidates who wrote rote, narrative answers failed, while those who engaged with texts critically and referenced literary criticism stood out. Remember: Literature is about ideas, style, and impact — not just dates and names. Show the examiner you can appreciate, analyze, and critique Urdu literature, and you will shine. Stay motivated: every poet you analyze, every critic you reference, every movement you connect with history brings you closer to mastering this paper. With the right approach, Urdu Literature can become one of your most rewarding optionals.

CSS 2019 – Urdu Literature: Examiner’s Feedback and Student Guide Read More »

CSS 2019 – Town Planning & Urban Management: Examiner’s Feedback and Student Guide

CSS Examiner report 2019 – Town Planning & Urban Management: Examiner’s Feedback and Student Guide CSS Examiner report CSS Examiner report CSS Examiner report CSS Examiner report  . . Introduction Town Planning & Urban Management (TPUM) is a relatively new CSS optional that appeals to aspirants because of its short syllabus, relevance to Pakistan’s urban issues, and overlap with Environmental Science, Sociology, and Current Affairs. Many consider it “scoring.” However, the examiner’s report for CE-2019 showed that most candidates underperformed because they treated it superficially, lacked technical depth, and failed to apply urban planning principles to Pakistan’s challenges. Examiner Feedback (2019) The examiner observed: Performance was generally poor. Candidates gave descriptive, essay-type answers instead of technical, analytical responses. Many ignored urban planning theories, principles, and models, writing only about general problems like pollution and traffic. Application to Pakistan’s cities (Karachi, Lahore, Islamabad, Peshawar) was missing. Diagrams, maps, and flowcharts were rarely used, even though they could have made answers stronger. A small group of well-prepared candidates who applied planning concepts + Pakistan-specific examples + visuals stood out and scored well【Examiner-Reports-CE-2019.pdf†L247-L253】. Common Mistakes by Candidates Ignoring urban planning theories Few candidates mentioned planning models like Garden City, Concentric Zone, or Smart City concepts. Generalizing problems Writing long essays on traffic jams and pollution without offering structured planning solutions. No Pakistan-specific focus Neglecting to discuss Karachi’s informal settlements, Lahore’s transport crisis, or Islamabad’s master plan. Weak use of visuals Lack of city maps, zoning diagrams, or flowcharts. Poor structure Unorganized answers with weak outlines and examiner-unfriendly flow. Practical Preparation Strategies Learn core planning theories and models Garden City (Ebenezer Howard) Concentric Zone Model (Burgess) Sector Model (Hoyt) Multiple Nuclei Model Smart Cities and Sustainable Urbanism Apply to Pakistan’s urban challenges Karachi: katchi abadis, transport chaos, water scarcity. Lahore: smog, urban sprawl, BRT projects. Islamabad: poor implementation of CDA master plan. Use case studies and data Quote World Bank reports, UN-Habitat data, Pakistan’s Census and Economic Survey. Include diagrams and visuals Draw neat zoning diagrams, flowcharts of urban management processes, and maps. Propose structured solutions Short-term: waste management, traffic regulation, green belts. Long-term: sustainable housing, smart city planning, decentralization. Read authentic sources Peter Hall – Urban and Regional Planning UN-Habitat – State of World’s Cities Pakistan-specific planning commission reports. Organize answers logically Intro → theory/model → Pakistan’s problem → solution → conclusion. Encouraging Closing Note The CSS 2019 examiner’s report shows that Town Planning & Urban Management is scoring only when treated technically. Those who wrote vague essays failed, while those who applied models, case studies, and Pakistan’s context scored well. Remember: TPUM is not about describing problems — it’s about planning solutions. Every model you study, every city issue you analyze, every solution you propose makes your answer stand out. Stay motivated: Pakistan’s urban future depends on sound planning. By preparing this subject well, you not only improve your CSS chances but also understand real-world governance challenges.

CSS 2019 – Town Planning & Urban Management: Examiner’s Feedback and Student Guide Read More »

CSS 2019 – Psychology: Examiner’s Feedback and Student Guide

CSS 2019 – Psychology: Examiner’s Feedback and Student Guide . . CSS Psychology CSS Psychology CSS Psychology CSS Psychology CSS Psychology   Introduction Psychology is a popular CSS optional because of its manageable syllabus, practical nature, and overlap with everyday human behavior. Many aspirants select it thinking it is scoring and “easy.” However, the examiner’s report for CE-2019 revealed that most candidates underperformed because they treated it superficially. Weak understanding of theories, poor application, and absence of examples and experiments led to disappointing results. Examiner Feedback (2019) The examiner observed: Overall performance was unsatisfactory. Candidates wrote general essays on human behavior instead of psychological analyses. Many failed to explain key theories and experiments (Freud, Skinner, Pavlov, Piaget, etc.). Some confused basic concepts like personality vs character, learning vs conditioning, or intelligence vs aptitude. Diagrams, models, and case studies were rarely used. A handful of well-prepared candidates who combined theories + experiments + application to Pakistan performed very well【Examiner-Reports-CE-2019.pdf†L239-L246】. Common Mistakes by Candidates Superficial understanding Writing about “happiness” or “motivation” without referencing psychological theories. No mention of experiments Ignoring classical and modern studies: Pavlov’s dog experiment, Skinner’s operant conditioning, Milgram’s obedience study. Confusion in concepts Candidates mixed up cognitive psychology, behaviorism, psychoanalysis, and humanistic psychology. Weak application to Pakistan Few connected psychology to mental health, education, extremism, or workplace productivity in Pakistan. No visuals Lack of diagrams (e.g., brain parts, learning models) weakened answers. Practical Preparation Strategies Study core areas thoroughly Biological psychology (nervous system, brain), Learning & Memory, Personality, Abnormal Psychology, Social Psychology. Incorporate key theories and experiments Freud (psychoanalysis), Skinner (behaviorism), Piaget (cognitive development), Bandura (social learning). Apply psychology to Pakistan’s context Mental health awareness, suicide rates, education reforms, extremism, workplace stress. Use diagrams and visuals Neat brain diagrams, memory models, and conditioning flowcharts make answers clearer. Balance theory with practice Define → explain theory → cite experiment → apply to Pakistan → conclude. Use authentic references David Myers – Psychology Hilgard’s Introduction to Psychology Morgan & King – Introduction to Psychology. Practice analytical writing Attempt past paper questions under timed conditions. Encouraging Closing Note The CSS 2019 examiner’s report makes it clear: Psychology is scoring only if you prepare scientifically. Candidates who wrote general knowledge essays failed, while those who used theories, experiments, and applications excelled. Remember: Psychology is about explaining behavior with evidence. Every theory you study, every experiment you cite, every real-world application you provide strengthens your answers. Stay motivated: by mastering psychology, you not only secure good marks but also gain insights into human behavior that help in interviews, daily life, and public service.

CSS 2019 – Psychology: Examiner’s Feedback and Student Guide Read More »

You cannot copy content of this pages.