Q2. Discuss in Detail Plato’s Concept of ‘Justice’.
Introduction
Plato (427–347 BCE), the Greek philosopher and student of Socrates, laid the foundations of Western political philosophy. In his masterpiece The Republic, he devotes an entire dialogue to answering the pivotal question: What is Justice? For Plato, justice is not merely a legal or social norm—it is a moral principle that sustains harmony both in the individual soul and in the ideal state.
“Justice is doing one’s own work and not meddling with what isn’t one’s own.” — Plato, Republic IV
Plato’s conception of justice integrates metaphysics, ethics, psychology, and politics, making it a timeless ideal and a framework for statecraft.
- Method of Discovery: Dialectics in The Republic
Plato uses the Socratic method to explore the meaning of justice through a dialogue between Socrates and others such as Thrasymachus, Glaucon, and Adeimantus.
Interlocutor | Argument |
Thrasymachus | Justice is the interest of the stronger |
Glaucon | Justice is a social contract to avoid suffering |
Socrates (Plato) | Justice is intrinsic and essential to a well-ordered soul and society |
- Justice in the Individual and the State: The Analogy
Plato believes that the state is a larger reflection of the individual soul. Thus, to understand justice in society, one must understand it in the soul and vice versa.
- Tripartite Soul
Part of Soul | Virtue | Function |
Reason | Wisdom | Seeks truth and rules |
Spirit (Thumos) | Courage | Upholds convictions |
Appetite | Temperance | Desires material pleasures |
Justice in the soul: when each part performs its function under the rule of Reason.
- Tripartite State
Class | Virtue | Role |
Rulers (Philosopher-Kings) | Wisdom | Govern |
Auxiliaries (Warriors) | Courage | Defend |
Producers (Farmers, Artisans) | Temperance | Produce goods |
Justice in the state: when each class performs its own role without interfering in others.
“Justice is harmony in the polity and soul.” — Plato, Republic
- Features of Plato’s Concept of Justice
- Functional Specialization (Meritocracy)
Each individual must contribute according to their natural aptitude—no class mixing, no interference.
- Moral Ideal
Justice is not just external behavior, but an internal virtue reflecting balance and order.
- Unity over Equality
Plato prioritizes social cohesion and unity over equality. Justice is not egalitarian, but hierarchical, grounded in innate capabilities.
- Justice as Health
Just as health is the well-functioning of the body, justice is the well-functioning of the soul and state.
- Allegory of the Cave: A Moral Journey toward Justice
In Book VII of The Republic, Plato introduces the Allegory of the Cave to symbolize the journey from ignorance to enlightenment—from belief to true knowledge of justice.
Cave Symbol | Representation |
Shadows | Illusions of justice (social norms) |
Sun | The Form of the Good (ultimate truth, including justice) |
Ascent | The philosopher’s journey to discover real justice |
The philosopher-king, having seen true justice, must return to the cave to rule wisely.
- Relevance of Plato’s Justice Today
Domain | Application |
Political Theory | Basis of meritocracy and specialization |
Education | Emphasis on role-based training (akin to Plato’s Academy) |
Leadership | Ideal of philosopher-king as wise and morally upright ruler |
Moral Psychology | Justice as inner harmony resonates with modern humanistic psychology |
- Critical Evaluation
✅ Strengths
- Connects ethics and politics
- Prioritizes inner harmony and moral order
- Advocates for leadership by virtue, not birth or wealth
❌ Criticisms
Thinker | Critique |
Karl Popper | Called Plato a proto-totalitarian in The Open Society for favoring hierarchy and censorship |
Aristotle | Found Plato’s rigid class system impractical and anti-family |
Modern Critics | Justice without equality and liberty is elitist and authoritarian |
- Comparison with Modern Views
Thinker | View of Justice |
John Rawls | Justice as fairness and equal opportunity |
Hobbes | Justice is keeping social contracts |
Islamic View | Justice (Adl) is God’s command, with emphasis on equality and welfare |
Unlike these, Plato’s justice is teleological—justice is fulfilling one’s purpose (telos) in society and soul.
Conclusion
Plato’s concept of justice is a moral blueprint that transcends legalism. It envisions justice as a state of inner harmony and social order, achieved through each individual performing their natural function under the guidance of reason and wisdom. While criticized for authoritarian undertones, it remains one of the most profound and enduring visions of justice, influencing philosophers from Al-Farabi to Rawls.
As Plato declared, “Justice is not a matter of external acts, but of the condition of the soul.”
📌 Final Summary Table: Plato’s Justice at a Glance
Aspect | Description |
Definition | Harmony through each part doing its function |
In the Soul | Reason governs spirit and appetite |
In the State | Rulers govern auxiliaries and producers |
Key Virtue | Justice integrates wisdom, courage, temperance |
Critique | Hierarchical, undemocratic, idealistic |
Legacy | Foundation of idealism and moral politics |
Q3. Compare and Contrast the Concepts of the ‘Executive’ Presented by the Muslim Thinkers Al-Farabi, Al-Mawardi, and Shah Waliullah
Introduction
The concept of the executive authority has remained central to both Western and Islamic political traditions. In Islamic political thought, the nature and duties of executive power have evolved from the idealism of the Prophetic model to the pragmatism of dynastic rule. Three prominent Muslim thinkers—Al-Farabi, Al-Mawardi, and Shah Waliullah—grappled with the question of how a ruler should govern in alignment with divine will, justice, and social welfare.
These scholars, shaped by their unique historical circumstances, present a rich comparative canvas of idealism, realism, and reformist thought. Their contributions offer insightful paradigms for understanding Islamic executive authority both historically and in modern governance frameworks.
“He who does not govern by what Allah has revealed, they are the wrongdoers.” — Qur’an 5:45
- Historical and Intellectual Contexts of the Three Thinkers
Thinker | Era | Region | Context |
Al-Farabi | 9th–10th century | Baghdad | Abbasid intellectual renaissance; influenced by Greek philosophy |
Al-Mawardi | 11th century | Baghdad | Political fragmentation; weakening Abbasid Caliphate; rising Seljuk power |
Shah Waliullah | 18th century | Delhi | Decline of Mughal Empire; British incursion; moral decline of society |
These distinct contexts shaped their respective executive philosophies, from ideal ruler models to legal justifications of caliphate and religio-political reform movements.
- The Executive Authority in Each Thinker’s Framework
- Al-Farabi: The Idealist Philosopher-King
- In his magnum opus Al-Madina al-Fadila (The Virtuous City), Al-Farabi merges Islamic metaphysics with Greek political philosophy, particularly Plato and Aristotle.
- The executive (Imam) must be:
- Morally superior
- Intellectually enlightened
- Guided by divine wisdom and rational thought
“The chief aims of the ruler should be the achievement of human perfection and ultimate happiness.” — Al-Farabi
- The Imam mirrors divine reason and leads society towards spiritual and ethical fulfillment.
- He is akin to Plato’s philosopher-king and the Prophet (PBUH) in moral excellence.
- This model is utopian and designed for an elite moral-political leadership class.
- Al-Mawardi: Jurist of Realpolitik
- His work Al-Ahkam al-Sultaniyyah is the earliest systematic treatise on the Islamic state.
- The executive (Imam/Caliph) is a legal necessity for implementing Shari‘ah and safeguarding the Ummah.
Core responsibilities:
- Ensure law and order
- Lead Friday prayers and Jihad
- Appoint governors, judges, and collect zakat
- Uphold justice and protect religion and state
- Bay‘ah (allegiance) and Shura (consultation) are essential for legitimacy.
- Unlike Al-Farabi, succession is permitted via appointment or consultation, accommodating dynastic changes.
“Imamate is instituted as succession to Prophethood in order to guard the religion and manage the world.” — Al-Mawardi
- Shah Waliullah: The Islamic Reformer
- Witnessing Mughal decline, he emphasized the revival of Islamic governance through purification and reform.
- In Hujjatullah al-Baligha, he outlines a dual structure:
- Nabuwat: Source of divine law (Prophetic model)
- Mulukiyyat: Practical kingship within Shari‘ah bounds
- He proposed ijtihad-based dynamic leadership, capable of addressing new realities.
- The executive must promote Adl (justice), Maslahah (public good), and Shari‘ah enforcement.
“The real Khalifah is one who reflects the Prophet’s mission in both governance and spirituality.” — Shah Waliullah
- Comparative Analysis
Table: Comparing Executive Concepts
Feature | Al-Farabi | Al-Mawardi | Shah Waliullah |
Executive Title | Imam (Philosopher-King) | Imam/Caliph | Just King / Imam |
Philosophical Base | Rationalism + Revelation | Fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence) | Qur’an + Sunnah + Ijtihad |
Source of Legitimacy | Moral & intellectual excellence | Bay‘ah, qualifications under Shari‘ah | Divine law + popular acceptance |
Governance Focus | Human perfection, unity | Rule of law, public order | Reform, unity, moral governance |
Flexibility | Utopian; rigid ideal | Practical, adaptable | Dynamic; realist |
Influence of Greek Thought | High (Plato, Aristotle) | Low | Minimal |
Modern Relevance | Ethics in leadership | Islamic constitutionalism | Political revivalism |
- Western Parallels and Contrasts
Thinker | Similarities |
Plato | Al-Farabi’s ideal ruler = Plato’s philosopher-king |
Hobbes | Al-Mawardi’s need for order echoes Hobbes’ Leviathan |
Locke | Shah Waliullah promotes limited monarchy, akin to Locke’s civil government |
Yet, unlike Western secular theorists, all three Muslim thinkers root sovereignty in God (Tawheed) and link executive legitimacy to divine accountability.
- Qur’anic and Prophetic Foundations
Thinker | Qur’anic/Prophetic Reference |
Al-Farabi | Prophet as perfect man: “Indeed, in the Messenger of Allah you have a good example.” (Qur’an 33:21) |
Al-Mawardi | Governance duty: “Obey Allah, His Messenger, and those in authority among you.” (Qur’an 4:59) |
Shah Waliullah | Reform mandate: “You are the best nation brought forth for mankind.” (Qur’an 3:110) |
- Application in Historical Governance
- Abbasid Era (Al-Mawardi): His legal framework rationalized the Caliph’s shrinking power under military sultans
- Delhi Sultanate & Mughals (Shah Waliullah): Emphasized reform against corruption, moral decay, and disunity
- Modern States: Pakistan’s Objectives Resolution and Articles 62/63 echo Shah Waliullah’s emphasis on piety and competence
- Critical Evaluation
✅ Strengths
- Al-Farabi: Elevated the moral discourse of leadership
- Al-Mawardi: Balanced law, structure, and stability
- Shah Waliullah: Reconciled idealism with socio-political realism
❌ Limitations
Thinker | Criticism |
Al-Farabi | Utopian, lacks implementation mechanism |
Al-Mawardi | Justifies authoritarianism if it maintains order |
Shah Waliullah | Lack of political institutional framework |
“Power without justice is tyranny; justice without power is illusion.” — Ibn Khaldun
Conclusion
The visions of Al-Farabi, Al-Mawardi, and Shah Waliullah offer three enduring paradigms of executive power in Islamic political thought:
- The Idealist (Al-Farabi)
- The Legal-Pragmatist (Al-Mawardi)
- The Reformist Revivalist (Shah Waliullah)
Together, they emphasize that Islamic governance is not just a matter of legal administration but a moral obligation rooted in divine accountability, ethical leadership, and public welfare. Their frameworks remain relevant for Muslim societies seeking authentic, ethical, and effective governance models.
“The best of leaders are those who love justice, hate corruption, and govern as if God is watching.” — Islamic maxim
📀 Final Summary Chart: Executive Authority in Muslim Political Thought
Thinker | Model | Legitimacy | Modern Relevance |
Al-Farabi | Virtuous Philosopher | Moral-Intellectual | Ethics in governance |
Al-Mawardi | Legal Caliphate | Shari‘ah & Bay‘ah | Islamic legal-political systems |
Shah Waliullah | Reformist Rulership | Divine law + reform | Islamic revival movements |
Q4. Illustrate Hobbesian Concept of Limited ‘Right to Revolution’
Introduction
Thomas Hobbes (1588–1679), a foundational figure in modern political thought, is best known for advocating absolute sovereignty in his masterpiece Leviathan (1651). However, within his theory lies a subtle and often overlooked nuance: a limited right to revolution, particularly grounded in self-preservation. While Hobbes is commonly viewed as an apologist for absolutism, his allowance for disobedience under extreme circumstances reflects a pragmatic concession to natural human rights.
“The obligation of subjects to the sovereign is understood to last as long, and no longer, than the power lasts by which he is able to protect them.” — Hobbes, Leviathan
- Hobbesian Political Framework: The Sovereign and the Contract
- Hobbes’s state of nature is a condition of anarchy, war, and fear: “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.”
- To escape this, individuals surrender their rights to an absolute sovereign (Leviathan) in return for protection and order.
- This social contract creates a unitary sovereign whose commands must be obeyed unconditionally except where the sovereign fails in his primary duty: protection of life.
- The Residual Right of Self-Preservation
Despite championing absolutism, Hobbes allows a fundamental natural right to preserve one’s own life. If the sovereign:
- Orders a subject to commit suicide
- Sends a citizen to certain death (without cause)
- Fails to protect life or order
Then the subject has a right to resist, which is not rebellion in political terms but an individual withdrawal of consent.
“A covenant not to defend myself from force, by force, is always void.” — Leviathan, Ch. XIV
✅ Example:
If a soldier is forced into a suicidal mission, he has a right to flee, even if it violates state command.
- No Collective Right to Revolution?
- Hobbes explicitly denies the collective right to dismantle or overthrow the sovereign.
- Revolution, as a systemic political action, is viewed as regression to anarchy.
- The individual right to resist does not justify a political revolution against the sovereign unless:
- The sovereign collapses, or
- Protection ceases altogether, leading to the reversion of individuals into a state of nature where new contracts may emerge.
- Critical Evaluation: Is It a ‘Right’ or a Survival Reflex?
Argument | Evaluation |
Natural right of self-preservation remains | Hobbes preserves human dignity and nature’s law |
No legal recourse against tyranny | Leaves subjects vulnerable to systematic abuse |
Individual resistance ≠ political revolution | Hobbes aims to suppress instability, not empower reform |
Paradox of power vs. justice | Authority is secured, but justice may suffer |
“Where law ends, tyranny begins.” — John Locke, critiquing Hobbesian absolutism
- Comparative View: Hobbes vs. Locke and Rousseau
Feature | Hobbes | Locke | Rousseau |
Right to Revolution | Extremely limited, individual | Legal and moral if government fails | Legitimate if general will is violated |
Sovereignty | Absolute | Limited, conditional | Popular and collective |
Focus | Order and security | Liberty and property | Freedom and general will |
While Locke and Rousseau empower the masses, Hobbes is primarily concerned with avoiding civil war.
- Relevance Today
- Hobbes’s idea informs modern authoritarian regimes where order is prioritized over individual liberties.
- However, international human rights and constitutional protections today reflect Lockean principles more than Hobbesian thought.
- Nonetheless, Hobbes’s insistence on the legitimacy of state protection remains embedded in realist theories of international relations.
Conclusion
Although Thomas Hobbes is often interpreted as denying all forms of revolutionary rights, his theory preserves a narrow but significant right to individual self-preservation. This right, though not revolutionary in the collective sense, becomes revolutionary by implication when the sovereign fails to fulfill his part of the contract.
Hobbes’s right to revolution is thus a philosophical paradox: in denying collective revolt, he inadvertently sows the seeds for justifiable individual dissent when life and liberty are directly threatened.
“Fear and liberty are consistent.” — Hobbes, suggesting even the most submissive subject retains the right to live.
Q5. Describe in detail Karl Marx’s Views on Class, State and Religion
Introduction
Karl Marx (1818–1883), the revolutionary thinker, economist, and philosopher, remains one of the most influential figures in political theory. His thought system, broadly known as historical materialism, focuses on the role of economic structures in shaping social and political institutions. Central to Marx’s analysis are the concepts of class struggle, the state as an instrument of oppression, and religion as ideological control.
“The history of all hitherto existing societies is the history of class struggle.” — Karl Marx, Communist Manifesto (1848)
Through a critical lens, Marx viewed society as inherently conflict-ridden, shaped by economic exploitation and propped up by ideological apparatuses. His views on class, state, and religion are deeply interwoven in his critique of capitalist society.
- Marx’s Concept of Class
🔹 Historical Materialism and Class Structure
- Marx’s theory of class conflict stems from his broader framework of historical materialism.
- Economic production (the base) determines all other aspects of society (the superstructure).
- Every historical epoch is characterized by a dominant class that controls the means of production and a subordinate class that is exploited.
🔹 Key Class Dichotomies:
Epoch | Dominant Class | Subordinate Class |
Ancient | Slave owners | Slaves |
Feudal | Lords | Serfs |
Capitalist | Bourgeoisie (owners) | Proletariat (workers) |
“The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win.” — Communist Manifesto
🔹 Alienation and Exploitation
- Workers are alienated from:
- Their labor
- The product they create
- The process of production
- Their human potential
This alienation results from the commodification of labor and surplus value extracted by the bourgeoisie.
🔹 Class Struggle and Revolution
- The contradiction between the bourgeoisie and proletariat will lead to class consciousness and eventually a proletarian revolution, creating a classless society.
- Marx’s View of the State
🔹 State as an Instrument of Class Domination
- Contrary to liberal views that see the state as a neutral arbiter, Marx saw the state as a tool used by the ruling class to maintain control.
“The executive of the modern state is but a committee for managing the common affairs of the whole bourgeoisie.”
🔹 Functions of the Capitalist State
- Protect private property
- Enforce class-based legal norms
- Suppress dissent (police, military)
- Legitimize capitalism through democratic illusion
🔹 Withering Away of the State
- In Marx’s utopia (Communist stage), the state will “wither away” as class antagonisms are resolved and communal ownership prevails.
“In the higher phase of communist society… the narrow horizon of bourgeois right can be fully left behind.” — Critique of the Gotha Programme
🔹 Stages of Political Development According to Marx
Stage | Political System | Economic System |
Feudalism | Monarchies/Autocracy | Land-based economy |
Capitalism | Parliamentary democracy | Private property & wage labor |
Socialism | Proletarian dictatorship | State-owned production |
Communism | Stateless society | Classless, common ownership |
- Marx’s View of Religion
🔹 Religion as Ideology
- Marx viewed religion as a product of material and social suffering.
- It serves as an opiate to keep the masses submissive, diverting their focus from real socio-economic injustice.
“Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world… It is the opium of the people.”
🔹 Religion in the Superstructure
- Part of the ideological superstructure shaped by the economic base.
- Used to justify the status quo and legitimize exploitation.
🔹 Criticism of Church-State Nexus
- Religious institutions often align with dominant classes (e.g., monarchs, landlords) to propagate submissiveness and prevent revolutionary consciousness.
- Interconnection of Class, State, and Religion
Marx’s brilliance lies in the interlinking of these three domains:
- Class determines material conditions
- State defends class relations
- Religion masks suffering and legitimizes class oppression
Element | Role in Oppression |
Class | Economic exploitation |
State | Political enforcement |
Religion | Ideological justification |
Thus, liberation from class domination requires not just economic revolution but also political overthrow and ideological awakening.
- Critical Perspective and Relevance
✅ Strengths
- Explains systemic inequalities in capitalist societies
- Reveals power structures masked by liberal democracy
- Encourages emancipation through class consciousness
❌ Limitations
- Overemphasis on economic determinism
- Failure to predict resilience of capitalism
- Neglect of cultural, racial, and gender dimensions of oppression
“Marxism has failed as a prophecy but succeeded as a critique.” — Eric Hobsbawm
- Contemporary Relevance
- Rising economic inequality, class polarization, and global labor exploitation echo Marx’s concerns.
- In developing countries, class-based politics and elite capture of state machinery validate Marxian insights.
- Religion and nationalism still function as tools of political control.
“The 1% own more wealth than 50% of the world’s population.” — Oxfam, 2023 Report
Conclusion
Karl Marx’s thought presents a powerful lens through which to critique the intertwined structures of economic exploitation, political power, and ideological control. His theories on class conflict, the state as a repressive apparatus, and religion as a tool of domination remain foundational to political theory and social critique.
While his revolutionary vision of a classless society remains unfulfilled, his diagnosis of capitalism’s contradictions and call for emancipatory politics continue to inspire scholars, reformers, and movements across the globe.
“Philosophers have only interpreted the world in various ways; the point, however, is to change it.” — Theses on Feuerbach
Q7. Discuss in Detail the Development of Local-Self Governments in Pakistan
Introduction
Local-self government, also known as local government, refers to the decentralized political system where administrative and financial authority is devolved to the grassroots. In Pakistan, the development of local-self governments has been inconsistent, often manipulated by central regimes, yet it remains a vital aspect of participatory democracy and efficient governance.
“The best government is that which is closest to the people.” — Thomas Jefferson
- Historical Background: Colonial Legacy
🔹 British India (1882–1947)
- Lord Ripon’s resolution (1882) laid the foundation of local governance
- Aimed at political training of natives
- Continued under Government of India Acts (1919, 1935)
“The Provincial Autonomy introduced in 1935 paved the way for limited local representation.”
- Post-Independence Evolution in Pakistan
🔹 Basic Democracies Ordinance (1959) — Ayub Khan
- First systematic local government introduced
- Four-tiered system: Union, Tehsil, District, Division
- Used to bypass political parties and legitimize military rule
🔹 Local Government Ordinance (1979) — Zia-ul-Haq
- Reinforced local bodies; introduced elected councils
- Focused on Islamization and devolution, but lacked financial autonomy
🔹 Local Government Plan (2001) — Pervez Musharraf
- Most comprehensive local governance framework
- Three-tiered structure: District, Tehsil, Union
- Introduced Nazim system; directly elected mayors
- Enhanced administrative and fiscal powers
“Devolution of power is a key to real democracy.” — General Musharraf (2001)
🔹 18th Amendment (2010) — PPP Era
- Constitutionally mandated local governments under Article 140A
- Provincial autonomy increased; LG became a provincial subject
- Yet implementation varied across provinces
- Structure of Local-Self Government in Pakistan (Current)
Tier | Unit | Functions |
District | District Council | Health, education, local taxation |
Tehsil | Tehsil Council | Roads, water supply, sanitation |
Union | Union Council | Birth registration, dispute resolution |
- Challenges in Development
Challenge | Description |
Political manipulation | LGs introduced by dictators, ignored by civilian governments |
Financial constraints | No fiscal autonomy; dependent on provinces |
Lack of continuity | Ad-hocism, dissolutions, and delayed elections |
Legal ambiguities | Variance in provincial LG Acts; absence of uniform framework |
Capacity gaps | Poor training and technical skills at grassroots level |
“Local governments in Pakistan are born to die.” — Dr. Ijaz Gilani, Political Analyst
- Comparative Insights: Lessons from India & Bangladesh
- India: 73rd Amendment ensures a strong panchayati raj system
- Bangladesh: Local government bodies constitutionally entrenched
Unlike Pakistan, both countries have institutionalized their local governance models.
- The Way Forward
- Enforce Article 140A uniformly across all provinces
- Ensure fiscal decentralization with direct resource allocation
- Conduct regular LG elections via Election Commission
- Strengthen capacity-building programs for elected representatives
- Promote digital governance tools (e.g., Punjab’s e-Khidmat centers)
Conclusion
The development of local-self governments in Pakistan reflects a paradox: while their constitutional significance and practical importance are undeniable, they remain undermined by political insecurity and institutional neglect. A vibrant local government system is essential for deepening democracy, enhancing service delivery, and ensuring responsive governance.
“Democracy must begin at the grassroots.” — Mahatma Gandhi
If Pakistan is to mature politically, it must prioritize the institutionalization and empowerment of local-self governments as an engine of sustainable development and democratic consolidation.
Q8. Write Short Notes on the Following: ✒️ (a) Islamic Political Ideology ✒️ (b) Forms of Political Culture
(a) Islamic Political Ideology
Islamic political ideology is rooted in the Qur’an and Sunnah and advocates a theocratic yet just order where sovereignty belongs to Allah alone. Unlike secular ideologies, it integrates faith and governance. The state is a vicegerency (Khilafah) to implement justice (Adl), welfare (Maslaha), and consultation (Shura).
Core Elements:
- Tawhid (Unity of God): Foundation of sovereignty
- Shariah (Divine Law): Guiding framework for governance
- Khilafah (Vicegerency): Accountability of rulers to God and people
- Shura (Consultation): Encourages participatory decision-making
- Justice and Welfare: Ensures socio-economic balance
“Indeed, Allah commands you to render trusts to whom they are due and when you judge between people to judge with justice…” — Surah An-Nisa (4:58)
Modern scholars like Abul A’la Maududi, Iqbal, and Dr. Hamidullah have emphasized that Islam doesn’t separate religion from politics. Instead, it presents a moral-political code to establish a welfare state (Riyasat-e-Madina).
(b) Forms of Political Culture
Political culture refers to the collective beliefs, values, and attitudes of people towards their political system. It shapes the behavior of citizens and institutions and influences stability, legitimacy, and democratic development.
Almond and Verba’s Classification:
Type | Characteristics | Example |
Parochial | Limited awareness and participation | Tribal societies in rural Afghanistan |
Subject | Awareness but passive acceptance | Communist China under Mao |
Participant | Active engagement, civic responsibility | United States, Norway |
Other Forms:
- Civic Political Culture: A mix of participation, trust, and democratic values
- Authoritarian Political Culture: Emphasis on hierarchy, obedience
- Postmodern Political Culture: Emphasizes diversity, rights, and skepticism
In Pakistan, a hybrid political culture persists—marked by religious values, authoritarian remnants, and growing civic activism.
“Political culture is not static. It evolves through education, media, and generational change.” — Gabriel Almond
. . Political Science I-2022 Political Science I-2022 Political Science I-2022 Political Science I-2022 Political Science I-2022 Political Science I-2022 Political Science I-2022 Political Science I-2022 Political Science I-2022 Political Science I-2022 Political Science I-2022 Political Science I-2022 Political Science I-2022 Political Science I-2022 Political Science I-2022 Political Science I-2022