Css 2019

Log In

Q. No. 2. How the system of Checks and Balances works in the US political system? Explain with examples.

Outline

  1. Introduction
  2. Concept of Checks and Balances
  3. Historical Background (The Founding Fathers’ Vision)
  4. Constitutional Basis of the System
  5. Working of Checks and Balances
    • Executive → Legislative and Judicial
    • Legislative → Executive and Judicial
    • Judicial → Executive and Legislative
  6. Case Examples
  7. Modern Challenges and Criticisms
  8. Conclusion
  1. Introduction

The system of checks and balances is a cornerstone of the U.S. Constitution that ensures no single branch of government becomes too powerful. Through a sophisticated distribution of powers among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches, it fosters accountability, protects civil liberties, and sustains the democratic spirit of governance.

  1. Concept of Checks and Balances
  • Introduced by Montesquieu in his theory of separation of powers.
  • It enables each branch of government to limit the powers of the other two, maintaining equilibrium in state functions.
  1. Historical Background
  • US Founding Fathers, especially James Madison in Federalist No. 51, emphasized:

“Ambition must be made to counteract ambition.”

The objective was to prevent tyranny and abuse of power, based on their experience with British monarchy.

  1. Constitutional Basis

The US Constitution establishes:

  • Article I – Legislative powers (Congress)
  • Article II – Executive powers (President)
  • Article III – Judicial powers (Supreme Court)

Each article empowers and limits the respective branch, enforcing checks on the others.

  1. Working of Checks and Balances

Branch

Checks Exercised On

Nature of Power

Example

Executive (President)

Legislative

Veto Power

President can veto bills passed by Congress

Executive

Judicial

Nomination

Appoints federal judges, including Supreme Court justices

Legislative (Congress)

Executive

Override Veto

Can override veto with 2/3 majority

Legislative

Executive

Impeachment

Can impeach and remove the president

Legislative

Judicial

Approvals

Confirms judicial appointments

Judicial (Courts)

Legislative & Executive

Judicial Review

Can strike down unconstitutional laws or executive orders

  1. Case Examples
  2. Impeachment of President Donald Trump (2019 & 2021)
  • House of Representatives initiated impeachment (legislative check on executive).
  • Senate conducted trial—highlighting the power balance.
  1. Marbury v. Madison (1803)
  • Landmark case that established judicial review, allowing courts to invalidate laws deemed unconstitutional.
  1. United States v. Nixon (1974)
  • Supreme Court ruled against President Nixon, limiting executive privilege and forcing release of Watergate tapes.
  1. Biden’s Student Loan Forgiveness Plan (2023)
  • Struck down by the Supreme Court, showing judicial check on executive spending decisions.
  1. Modern Challenges and Criticisms
  • Partisan Gridlock: Increasing political polarization has led to institutional paralysis.
  • Executive Overreach: Presidents increasingly rely on executive orders, bypassing legislative checks.
  • Judicial Activism: Courts are often criticized for legislating from the bench.

“The system is designed for tension and compromise, but not for paralysis.” — Prof. Laurence Tribe (Harvard Law)

  1. Conclusion

The checks and balances system is fundamental to the US democratic framework, ensuring that power is not concentrated in one branch. Despite modern political challenges, it remains a resilient safeguard against authoritarianism. When properly respected and functioning, it fosters governmental accountability, constitutional governance, and public trust.

✅ Summary Table

Branch

Checks It Has

Checked Branch

President

Veto, Appointments, Executive Orders

Congress, Judiciary

Congress

Impeachment, Budget Control, Lawmaking

President, Judiciary

Supreme Court

Judicial Review, Interpretation of Laws & Constitution

Congress, President

Q. No. 3. How the party system in France is different to that in Germany? Discuss in detail.

Outline

  1. Introduction
  2. Political Systems: France vs. Germany
  3. Comparative Analysis of Party Systems
    • Electoral System
    • Party Structure and Organization
    • Coalition Politics
    • Role of Ideology
    • Party Stability
    • Far-Right and Populism
  4. Summary Table: France vs. Germany
  5. Contemporary Challenges and Reforms
  6. Conclusion
  1. Introduction

Party systems are the engines of democratic politics, shaping governance, elections, and public opinion. While both France and Germany are liberal democracies in Western Europe, their party systems reflect divergent historical experiences, electoral frameworks, and institutional arrangements.

France exhibits a volatile and fragmented party system, whereas Germany maintains a stable, coalition-driven multiparty system.

  1. Political Systems: Structural Overview

France

Germany

Semi-presidential republic

Parliamentary federal republic

Dual executive (President + PM)

Single executive (Chancellor)

Constitution of 1958 (Fifth Republic)

Basic Law (Grundgesetz, 1949)

  1. Comparative Analysis of Party Systems
  2. Electoral System

France

Germany

Two-Round System for presidential and legislative elections

Mixed-Member Proportional Representation (MMP)

Favors larger parties in second round

Balances direct vote and proportional representation

Encourages strategic voting and post-election alliances

Encourages inclusive coalition building

Result: Germany ensures better proportionality, while France can see disproportionate power gains.

  1. Party Structure and Organization
  • France:
    • Highly leader-centric parties (e.g., La République En Marche led by Macron)
    • Rapid rise and fall of parties common
    • Less party discipline
    • Political movements often replace traditional parties
  • Germany:
    • Institutionalized parties with deep roots (CDU, SPD, Greens)
    • Structured hierarchies, clear manifestos
    • Strong internal democracy and accountability
  1. Coalition Politics

France

Germany

Coalitions are rare nationally, but common in parliament during cohabitation

Coalition governments are the norm

President’s party often dominates due to majority bonus

Parties negotiate complex coalitions (e.g., “traffic light coalition”)

Example: 2021 German elections resulted in SPD-Green-FDP coalition; in France, Macron’s coalition required support from centrists to govern.

  1. Role of Ideology
  • France:
    • Ideological landscape is fluid.
    • Rise of populist-left (Mélenchon) and far-right (Le Pen).
    • Traditional left-right divisions have weakened since 2017.
  • Germany:
    • Parties are ideologically anchored (CDU: center-right, SPD: center-left).
    • Fringe parties like AfD exist but are marginalized in policy-making.
  1. Party Stability
  • France:
    • Frequent creation and dissolution of parties (e.g., Socialist Party weakened post-2017).
    • Presidentialism contributes to personalization of politics.
  • Germany:
    • Stable, with a long-standing multiparty tradition.
    • Constitutional safeguards maintain party system integrity.
  1. Far-Right and Populism

France

Germany

National Rally (Le Pen) has significant public support (20–40%)

Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) rising, but cordoned off via “firewall”

Populism has reshaped mainstream debates

Populism remains contained through political consensus

  1. Summary Table: France vs. Germany Party Systems

Feature

France

Germany

System Type

Semi-presidential

Parliamentary

Electoral System

Two-round majoritarian

Mixed-member proportional

Party System Type

Fragmented, dynamic

Stable multiparty

Coalition Practice

Ad-hoc, rare nationally

Institutionalized and essential

Party Discipline

Weak

Strong

Ideological Polarization

High, fluid

Moderate, anchored

Role of Populism

Central to mainstream politics

Marginalized through political firewall

  1. Contemporary Challenges and Reforms

France:

  • Decline of traditional parties (e.g., Socialist Party, Republicans)
  • Rise of movement-based politics
  • Growing polarization and voter abstention

Germany:

  • Managing coalitions in increasingly fragmented Bundestag
  • Rising AfD presence in eastern regions
  • Debates over party financing and digital engagement
  1. Conclusion

The French and German party systems represent contrasting models shaped by institutional choices, electoral rules, and historical trajectories. While France struggles with volatility and personality-driven politics, Germany demonstrates institutional resilience through coalition stability and party discipline.

“If France represents the vibrancy of democratic experimentation, Germany stands for the virtue of institutional endurance.”

Q. No. 4. Critically analyze the role of military in the Turkish politics.

Outline

  1. Introduction
  2. Historical Background of Civil-Military Relations in Turkey
  3. Military’s Role in Turkish Politics: Chronological Overview
  4. Constitutional and Institutional Power of the Military
  5. Reasons Behind Military Dominance
  6. Democratic Transition and Civilian Pushback
  7. Post-2016 Coup Attempt and Reconfiguration of Civil-Military Relations
  8. Critical Analysis: Achievements vs. Setbacks
  9. Comparison with Other Democracies
  10. Conclusion
  1. Introduction

The military in Turkey has long played a pivotal and paradoxical role—acting both as the guardian of secularism and national unity and as an intervener in democratic politics. Although Turkey is a constitutional democracy, its political history has been deeply shaped by military tutelage, especially throughout the 20th century.

  1. Historical Background of Civil-Military Relations
  • Founded in 1923 by Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, the Republic of Turkey was deeply influenced by the Kemalist ideology, which emphasized secularism, nationalism, and modernization.
  • The Turkish Armed Forces (TAF) were regarded as the protector of Kemalism, and hence often acted as a parallel power center.
  1. Military’s Role in Turkish Politics: Chronological Overview

Year

Event

Description

1960

First coup d’état

Overthrew Adnan Menderes; executed him for alleged authoritarianism

1971

“Coup by memorandum”

Forced Prime Minister Demirel to resign without taking power directly

1980

Full-scale coup

Military rule for 3 years; political parties dissolved, new constitution introduced

1997

“Post-modern coup”

Military forced Islamist PM Erbakan to resign using media and judiciary

2016

Failed coup attempt

Faction of military attempted to overthrow Erdoğan; failed, led to massive purges

  1. Constitutional and Institutional Power of the Military
  • National Security Council (MGK) used to be a powerful advisory body dominated by generals.
  • The military controlled universities, judiciary, and even media to preserve secularism.
  • Turkish constitution (pre-2001 reforms) granted the military autonomy and political oversight functions.
  1. Reasons Behind Military Dominance
  • Kemalist Legacy: The military perceived itself as the vanguard of Atatürk’s secular ideology.
  • Weak Political Institutions: Civilian governments often lacked stability and credibility.
  • Public Trust: In the early decades, many citizens viewed the military as more competent than politicians.
  • Legal Immunity: Army officials had judicial protection and were not easily accountable to civilian courts.
  1. Democratic Transition and Civilian Pushback
  • Starting from the early 2000s, under Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s AKP, Turkey witnessed a significant civilian reassertion.
  • EU accession talks and democratic reforms under EU pressure led to:
    • Curtailment of MGK’s power
    • Trials against military leaders (Ergenekon and Balyoz cases)
    • Reduced military role in higher education and media
  1. Post-2016 Coup Attempt and Reconfiguration
  • The failed coup on July 15, 2016 marked a turning point:
    • 300+ killed; thousands injured
    • Erdoğan accused Fethullah Gülen and his network (FETÖ)
    • Over 100,000 civil servants and military officers purged

Post-Coup Measures:

  • Military brought under Ministry of Defense control
  • Closure of military academies
  • Restructuring of Supreme Military Council to give civilians more control
  • Military bases moved out of urban centers

“The 2016 coup attempt marked the end of military tutelage but the beginning of civilian authoritarianism.” — Prof. M. Heper

  1. Critical Analysis: Achievements vs. Setbacks
  2. Positive Role:
  • Preserved territorial integrity in tumultuous Cold War era
  • Contained Islamist and ultra-leftist insurgencies
  • Maintained secular values in early decades
  1. Negative Impacts:
  • Interrupted democratic evolution via repeated coups
  • Stifled political pluralism and civil liberties
  • Justified interventions under pretext of “national security”
  • Undermined civilian supremacy and accountability mechanisms
  1. Comparative Insight: Turkey vs. Other Democracies

Country

Military Role

Outcome

Pakistan

Politicized, multiple coups

Institutional weakening, hybrid regimes

India

Strictly apolitical military

Strengthening of democratic norms

Turkey

Intermittent interventions

Oscillating between guardianship and reform

  1. Conclusion

Turkey’s military has historically acted as a political arbiter, sometimes protecting secularism, but often at the cost of democracy. The post-2016 era has curbed the military’s political dominance, but this has coincided with a drift toward civilian authoritarianism. A balanced civil-military relationship, based on constitutional supremacy, civilian oversight, and institutional accountability, remains the best way forward.

“A democracy is only meaningful when its guardians guard its values—not dominate its institutions.”

Q. No. 5. Iqbal is credited with creating the idea of Pakistan. Give your arguments.

Outline

  1. Introduction
  2. Historical Context of Muslim Identity in Colonial India
  3. Iqbal’s Political Philosophy and Vision
  4. Allahabad Address 1930: The Intellectual Birth of Pakistan
  5. Key Arguments Supporting Iqbal’s Role
  6. Iqbal’s Correspondence with Jinnah
  7. Impact of Iqbal’s Vision on Muslim League and Later Movements
  8. Criticisms and Counterviews
  9. Conclusion
  1. Introduction

Allama Muhammad Iqbal, the poet-philosopher of the East, is widely revered for envisioning the idea of a separate Muslim homeland in South Asia. While the formal creation of Pakistan is attributed to the Muslim League and Muhammad Ali Jinnah, Iqbal laid the ideological and philosophical foundations that later culminated in the Pakistan Resolution of 1940.

  1. Historical Context of Muslim Identity in Colonial India
  • Post-1857 period saw the marginalization of Muslims in British India.
  • Rise of Hindu nationalism (e.g., Bande Mataram, Cow Protection Movement) posed existential threats to Muslim cultural and political identity.
  • Sir Syed Ahmad Khan initiated a reformist agenda but stopped short of separatism.
  • Iqbal went beyond Sir Syed, offering a political and territorial vision of Muslim empowerment.
  1. Iqbal’s Political Philosophy and Vision

Iqbal’s vision was grounded in:

  • Islamic universalism and khudi (selfhood)
  • Belief in Muslims as a distinct nation (Millat)
  • Integration of spirituality with statecraft

“Islam is not a church. It is a complete civilization.” — Iqbal, Reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam

Iqbal rejected the Western nation-state model based solely on geography or language and instead emphasized religio-cultural identity.

  1. Allahabad Address 1930: The Intellectual Birth of Pakistan

Delivered on 29th December 1930 at the All-India Muslim League session in Allahabad, Iqbal said:

“I would like to see the Punjab, North-West Frontier Province, Sind and Baluchistan amalgamated into a single state.”

This is considered the earliest formal articulation of the Muslim state idea, which later formed the core territory of Pakistan.

  1. Key Arguments Supporting Iqbal’s Role
  2. Ideological Foundation
  • Provided a visionary framework that linked Islam, politics, and identity.
  • Inspired a generation of Muslims with his poetry and political thought.
  1. Concept of Muslim Nationhood
  • Iqbal asserted that Indian Muslims were not a minority, but a separate nation.
  • This was the conceptual departure point from Congress nationalism.
  1. Territorial Suggestion
  • Unlike earlier thinkers, Iqbal suggested specific geography for Muslim autonomy.
  • This marks the blueprint of Pakistan’s western wing.
  1. Influence on Jinnah
  • Jinnah acknowledged Iqbal as a guide and philosopher.
  • Iqbal encouraged Jinnah to return to India and lead the Muslims in letters dated 1936–1937.
  1. Iqbal’s Correspondence with Jinnah (1936–37)

In a famous letter, Iqbal wrote:

“A separate federation of Muslim provinces… is the only course by which we can secure a peaceful India and save Muslims from domination by the majority.”

These letters clearly show Iqbal’s active political engagement and direct influence on Jinnah’s thought.

  1. Impact on Muslim League and Later Developments
  • The Lahore Resolution (1940), which formally demanded Pakistan, was a logical continuation of Iqbal’s Allahabad vision.
  • Iqbal’s philosophical foundation helped the Muslim League frame its two-nation theory.
  • Posthumous inspiration: Iqbal passed away in 1938, but his thought became central to Pakistan’s national narrative.
  1. Criticisms and Counterviews
  2. No Direct Mention of ‘Pakistan’
  • Critics argue that Iqbal did not use the term ‘Pakistan’, which was coined by Choudhry Rahmat Ali in 1933.
  • However, Iqbal’s concept of Muslim autonomy in northwestern India aligns with what Pakistan became.
  1. Ambiguity in Vision
  • Some scholars argue Iqbal was more concerned with Muslim rights than with complete secession.
  • Others argue he envisioned a confederal arrangement, not a sovereign state.

Yet the weight of his address, writings, and letters clearly favor distinct Muslim political sovereignty.

  1. Conclusion

Allama Iqbal’s role in the ideological creation of Pakistan is both profound and foundational. While he did not live to witness its creation, his Allahabad Address, poetry, and correspondence with Jinnah established the intellectual premise upon which Pakistan was founded.

As Jinnah said in 1940:
“Iqbal is no more amongst us, but had he been alive, he would have been our guide, our philosopher, and our friend.”

✅ Summary Table: Iqbal’s Contributions

Aspect

Contribution

Ideology

Muslim nationhood, Islamic polity

Political Thought

Allahabad Address – vision of Muslim state

Inspiration

Guided Jinnah through personal correspondence

Cultural Legacy

Used Urdu and Persian poetry to unite Muslims

Philosophical Base

Khudi, Ijtihad, Islamic universalism

Q. No. 6. What factors contributed to the delay of constitution making process in the early years of Pakistan? Discuss in detail.

Outline

  1. Introduction
  2. Overview of Pakistan’s Constitutional History (1947–1956)
  3. Key Factors Causing Delay in Constitution-Making
    • Political Instability
    • Absence of a Clear Constitutional Model
    • Ethnic and Linguistic Diversity
    • Disputes Over the Nature of the State (Islamic vs. Secular)
    • Representation Controversy (East vs. West Pakistan)
    • Weak Institutional Framework
    • Assassination of Key Leaders
    • Role of Bureaucracy and Governor-General
  4. Impact of the Delay
  5. Conclusion
  1. Introduction

The process of constitution-making in Pakistan was prolonged and tumultuous, taking nearly nine years after independence to culminate in the Constitution of 1956. While Pakistan gained freedom in 1947, it struggled with ideological, administrative, and political divisions that prevented timely constitutional development. Unlike India, which adopted its constitution by 1950, Pakistan’s delay reveals deep structural and political fault lines.

  1. Overview of Pakistan’s Constitutional History (1947–1956)
  • Independence: August 14, 1947
  • Objective Resolution: March 1949 (provided ideological basis)
  • First Draft Constitution: 1954 (dissolved by Ghulam Muhammad)
  • Constitution Enacted: March 23, 1956
  • Abrogated by Martial Law: 1958
  1. Key Factors Contributing to the Delay
  2. Political Instability and Frequent Leadership Changes
  • Pakistan saw frequent turnover of prime ministers from 1947 to 1956.
  • Liaquat Ali Khan’s assassination (1951) created a political vacuum.
  • Weak political parties and personalized politics stalled democratic consensus.
  1. Absence of a Clear Constitutional Model
  • Debates over parliamentary vs. presidential, federal vs. unitary, Islamic vs. secular systems delayed progress.
  • Lack of experienced constitutional experts and overreliance on British colonial legacy added to the confusion.
  1. Ethnic and Linguistic Diversity
  • Disputes between Bengalis, Punjabis, Sindhis, Pashtuns, and Baloch over power-sharing, language, and identity.
  • The language controversy (Urdu vs. Bengali) particularly alienated East Pakistan.
  1. Disagreement on Islamic Nature of the State
  • The Objective Resolution (1949) laid down an Islamic framework, but secular and minority groups opposed it.
  • Religious scholars wanted Sharia-based laws, while modernists preferred a secular-democratic framework.
  1. Representation Disputes Between East and West Pakistan
  • East Pakistan had 55% of the population, yet political dominance was held by West Pakistani elites.
  • One Unit policy (1955) aimed to consolidate West Pakistan, which further deepened distrust.

Region

Population %

Representation Demand

East Pakistan

~55%

Wanted population-based

West Pakistan

~45%

Wanted parity or more power

  1. Weak Institutional Framework
  • The Constituent Assembly lacked authority and cohesion.
  • Dominance of civil-military bureaucracy undercut democratic processes.
  1. Assassination of Key Leaders
  • Liaquat Ali Khan, the first Prime Minister and a skilled negotiator, was assassinated in 1951.
  • Loss of such leadership derailed momentum toward constitutional consensus.
  1. Role of Bureaucracy and Governor-General
  • Governor-General Ghulam Muhammad dismissed the Constituent Assembly in 1954, a major setback.
  • The judiciary upheld this dismissal in Federation of Pakistan v. Maulvi Tamizuddin Khan (1955), legitimizing executive overreach.
  1. Impact of the Delay
  • Delayed democratic development and institutional maturity.
  • Encouraged civil-military ascendancy over elected representatives.
  • Strengthened regional alienation, especially in East Pakistan.
  • Created legal ambiguity, leading to political instability and coups.

“A constitution delayed is a democracy denied.” — Paraphrased political maxim

  1. Conclusion

The prolonged constitution-making process in Pakistan was the result of ideological, regional, political, and institutional conflicts. The delay not only weakened the legitimacy of the state but also laid the groundwork for authoritarianism, centralization, and disintegration. Understanding these early failures is crucial for strengthening democratic governance today.

✅ Summary Table: Causes of Delay

Cause

Explanation

Political instability

Rapid PM changes, power struggles

Leadership vacuum

Loss of Liaquat Ali Khan

Ideological conflicts

Islamic vs. secular, unitary vs. federal debates

Regional disparity

East vs. West Pakistan representation crisis

Bureaucratic overreach

Assembly dissolution, judiciary compliance

Ethnic-linguistic tensions

Language movement, provincial autonomy concerns

Q. No. 7. What are the major obstacles to the process of national integration in contemporary Pakistan? Suggest remedies for success of the process.

Outline

  1. Introduction
  2. Understanding National Integration
  3. Major Obstacles to National Integration in Contemporary Pakistan
    • Ethnic and Linguistic Divisions
    • Political Instability and Lack of Consensus
    • Regional Disparities and Unequal Development
    • Religious Extremism and Sectarianism
    • Weak Education System and Ideological Confusion
    • Role of Media and Social Polarization
    • Centre-Province Imbalance
    • Interference by Non-democratic Forces
  4. Consequences of Disintegration
  5. Remedies for Achieving National Integration
    • Strengthening Federalism and Devolution
    • Promoting Inclusive Economic Development
    • Reforming Education and Promoting National Identity
    • Ensuring Political Stability and Democratic Continuity
    • Curbing Extremism and Promoting Tolerance
    • Strengthening Institutions and Rule of Law
    • Role of Media and Civil Society
  6. Conclusion
  1. Introduction

National integration is the foundation of unity, stability, and development in any state. In Pakistan, despite shared religion and history, achieving true integration remains a challenge due to ethnic, regional, ideological, and political divisions. These have manifested in conflicts, governance issues, and internal unrest, undermining the dream of a cohesive nation envisioned by the founding fathers.

  1. Understanding National Integration

National integration refers to the sense of unity and solidarity among different groups and regions of a state. It involves developing a common national identity, equitable distribution of resources, and inclusive participation in political and economic processes.

  1. Major Obstacles to National Integration in Contemporary Pakistan
  2. Ethnic and Linguistic Divisions
  • Pakistan is ethnically diverse (Punjabi, Sindhi, Pashtun, Baloch, Muhajir, etc.).
  • Ethnic tensions often arise over language, resource allocation, and cultural rights.
  • Movements like MQM (Urban Sindh) or Baloch nationalism highlight perceived marginalization.
  1. Political Instability and Lack of Consensus
  • Frequent civil-military interventions and the absence of national political consensus hinder unity.
  • Political polarization between major parties creates disillusionment and alienation.
  1. Regional Disparities and Unequal Development
  • Punjab dominates economically and politically, fueling resentment in smaller provinces.
  • Balochistan and interior Sindh suffer from lack of basic infrastructure, health, and education.

Province

HDI Rank

Per Capita GDP (PKR)

Punjab

High

176,000

Balochistan

Very Low

110,000

KP

Medium

145,000

  1. Religious Extremism and Sectarianism
  • Rise in Sunni-Shia violence, targeted killings, and minority persecution.
  • Religious intolerance fragments society and delegitimizes minority contributions to the nation.
  1. Weak Education System and Ideological Confusion
  • Multiple education systems (public, private, madrassas) promote different worldviews.
  • Curriculum often lacks focus on civic values, pluralism, and national unity.
  1. Role of Media and Social Polarization
  • Media has become highly politicized and contributes to spreading misinformation.
  • Lack of regulation leads to division instead of integration.
  1. Centre-Province Imbalance
  • Despite the 18th Amendment, implementation remains weak.
  • Centre often exercises excessive authority in resource allocation and policy design.
  1. Interference by Non-democratic Forces
  • Overreach by military and establishment undermines civilian institutions and weakens the democratic consensus needed for national cohesion.
  1. Consequences of Disintegration
  • Rise in separatist sentiments in Balochistan and Sindh.
  • Widespread distrust in state institutions.
  • Security challenges, economic loss, and foreign exploitation of internal divisions (e.g., by India or hostile elements).
  1. Remedies for Achieving National Integration
  2. Strengthening Federalism and Devolution
  • Ensure full implementation of the 18th Amendment.
  • Promote inter-provincial harmony through equitable revenue sharing (e.g., improved NFC Award).
  1. Promoting Inclusive Economic Development
  • Focus on uplift of underdeveloped regions: Balochistan, South Punjab, FATA.
  • Launch targeted programs like CPEC special economic zones for backward areas.
  1. Reforming Education and Promoting National Identity
  • Introduce uniform national curriculum (SNC) focused on tolerance and civic values.
  • Promote languages and cultures of all provinces in schools.
  1. Ensuring Political Stability and Democratic Continuity
  • Strong, fair electoral system to boost legitimacy of governance.
  • Establish Charter of Democracy among parties to avoid institutional sabotage.
  1. Curbing Extremism and Promoting Tolerance
  • Implement National Action Plan (NAP) without bias.
  • Support interfaith and inter-sect harmony through dialogue and religious boards.
  1. Strengthening Institutions and Rule of Law
  • Ensure judicial independence, police reforms, and depoliticization of bureaucracy.
  1. Role of Media and Civil Society
  • Promote responsible journalism and curb hate speech.
  • Empower youth and women through civil society platforms to promote national dialogue.
  1. Conclusion

National integration in Pakistan requires not merely slogans of unity, but concrete political, social, and economic reforms. It is only through inclusive governance, balanced development, and ideological clarity that the country can overcome the deep-rooted divisions and realize the vision of a united, progressive, and democratic Pakistan.

“Unity in diversity is not just a slogan, it is the necessity for survival in a federal state like Pakistan.”

✅ Summary Table: Challenges vs. Remedies

Challenge

Suggested Remedy

Ethnic division

Equitable federalism & cultural recognition

Sectarian violence

Religious tolerance programs

Political instability

Democratic continuity & electoral reforms

Regional disparity

Targeted development in marginalized provinces

Ideological confusion in education

Civic curriculum & teacher training

Media polarization

Media ethics and digital literacy

Q. No. 8. Write down the major determinants of the foreign policy of Pakistan.

Outline

  1. Introduction
  2. Understanding Foreign Policy
  3. Major Determinants of Pakistan’s Foreign Policy
    • Geostrategic Location
    • Security and Defence Concerns
    • Ideological Foundation and Islamic Identity
    • Relations with Major Powers
    • Economic Interests and Trade Requirements
    • Regional Dynamics (India, Afghanistan, China, Iran)
    • Kashmir Dispute
    • Public Opinion and Domestic Politics
    • Global Organizations and International Law
    • Water and Environmental Security
  4. Conclusion
  1. Introduction

Foreign policy is the strategic framework of a nation’s relations with the international community, driven by both domestic needs and external challenges. In the case of Pakistan, its foreign policy has evolved in response to geopolitical realities, ideological underpinnings, regional conflicts, and global power alignments. Understanding the key determinants helps contextualize Pakistan’s behavior on the world stage.

  1. Understanding Foreign Policy

“Foreign policy is the systematic pursuit of national interest beyond the borders.” – George Modelski

Pakistan’s foreign policy seeks to:

  • Safeguard sovereignty and territorial integrity
  • Promote economic development
  • Build strong diplomatic ties
  • Support Islamic causes and regional peace
  1. Major Determinants of Pakistan’s Foreign Policy
  2. Geostrategic Location
  • Pakistan is situated at the crossroads of South Asia, Central Asia, and the Middle East.
  • Its proximity to China, India, Afghanistan, and the Arabian Sea gives it strategic depth, but also makes it vulnerable to regional tensions.
  • The country’s location has attracted global powers (e.g., USA during the Cold War, China under CPEC) and shaped its role as a frontline state.

“Pakistan is located at a strategic pivot… it is the threshold to energy-rich Central Asia.” – Stephen P. Cohen

  1. Security and Defence Concerns
  • India remains the primary threat perception, especially after the wars of 1948, 1965, and 1971.
  • The need to maintain nuclear deterrence, balance conventional capabilities, and address cross-border terrorism guides defense-related diplomacy.
  • Relations with China and the U.S. have been deeply tied to military aid and security alliances (e.g., SEATO, CENTO, GWOT).
  1. Ideological Foundation and Islamic Identity
  • Pakistan was created on the basis of Islamic ideology.
  • The commitment to Muslim causes, such as Palestine, Kashmir, and support for OIC, remains part of its foreign policy.
  • This ideological stance also influences public opinion and relations with the Muslim world.
  1. Relations with Major Powers
  • China: A strategic partner for defense, trade, and CPEC.
  • United States: Fluctuating alliance, historically strong during Cold War, Afghan war, and post-9/11; increasingly strained.
  • Russia: Once hostile during Soviet-Afghan war; recent warming of ties post-2010.
  • Gulf States: Vital for remittances, energy imports, and religious affinity.
  1. Economic Interests and Trade Requirements
  • Pakistan’s foreign policy supports trade diplomacy, debt relief, and foreign investment.
  • Engagement with IMF, World Bank, and regional economic blocs (e.g., ECO, SCO) is shaped by economic necessity.
  • CPEC is a transformative pillar aimed at resolving energy and infrastructure deficits.
  1. Regional Dynamics and Neighborhood Policy
  • India: Hostile relations dominate policy focus (Kashmir, Siachen, LOC violations).
  • Afghanistan: Security concerns due to Taliban rule, refugee crisis, and border management (Durand Line).
  • Iran: Religious, economic, and geopolitical interactions, especially in balancing ties with Saudi Arabia.
  • China: Strategic ally and economic partner, especially post-CPEC.

Country

Nature of Relations

Key Issues

India

Adversarial

Kashmir, Terrorism, Trade

China

Strategic cooperation

CPEC, Defence, Economic Corridors

Afghanistan

Volatile

TTP, Durand Line, Refugees

Iran

Complex

Sectarian issues, gas pipeline, border

  1. Kashmir Dispute
  • The Kashmir issue remains the core of Pakistan’s India policy.
  • Every major global engagement (UN, OIC, bilateral forums) is used to raise the Kashmir cause.
  • The revocation of Article 370 by India in 2019 escalated diplomatic tensions.
  1. Public Opinion and Domestic Politics
  • Public pressure in Pakistan often compels policymakers to align with popular sentiments, especially on:
    • India
    • Palestine
    • Islamophobia in the West
  • Domestic political instability also limits foreign policy continuity.
  1. Global Organizations and International Law
  • Active engagement with UN, OIC, WTO, IMF, and FATF influences foreign policy objectives.
  • Issues like nuclear policy, human rights, and counter-terrorism are shaped by international obligations.
  1. Water and Environmental Security
  • Indus Waters Treaty (1960) with India remains crucial for water security.
  • Climate change diplomacy and transboundary water disputes are emerging challenges influencing regional diplomacy.
  1. Conclusion

Pakistan’s foreign policy is multifaceted, shaped by its location, ideology, regional environment, and economic interests. While challenges remain—such as balancing ties between rival states, managing regional conflicts, and pursuing independent diplomacy—the key to success lies in consistent strategy, institutional stability, and economic self-reliance.

“Foreign policy is not just about friends and enemies; it’s about national interest.” – Henry Kissinger

✅ Summary Table: Determinants of Pakistan’s Foreign Policy

Determinant

Impact

Geostrategic Location

Strategic alliances, frontline state status

Security Concerns

Defense partnerships, nuclear deterrence

Ideological Identity

Muslim world unity, Kashmir, Palestine

Major Powers

Balancing US-China-Russia relationships

Economic Needs

Aid, trade, and FDI diplomacy

Regional Environment

India, Afghanistan, Iran dynamics

Public Opinion

Influence on state stance, especially on India/Islam

International Law

Compliance with UN, WTO, FATF

. . Political Science -II 2019 Political Science -II 2019 Political Science -II 2019 Political Science -II 2019 Political Science -II 2019 Political Science -II 2019 Political Science -II 2019 Political Science -II 2019 Political Science -II 2019 Political Science -II 2019 Political Science -II 2019 Political Science -II 2019 Political Science -II 2019 Political Science -II 2019 

You cannot copy content of this pages.