Css 2019

Log In

Q2. What are the main characteristics of the United Kingdom’s current political system? Has this system been successful in creating efficient mechanisms to ensure adequate public participation in the affairs of state?

Outline

  1. Introduction
  2. Main Characteristics of the UK Political System
    • Constitutional Monarchy
    • Parliamentary Sovereignty
    • Unwritten Constitution
    • Bicameral Legislature
    • Rule of Law
    • Independent Judiciary
    • Decentralization & Devolution
  3. Mechanisms of Public Participation
  4. Evaluation: Has the System Ensured Adequate Public Participation?
  5. Challenges and Limitations
  6. Comparative Insight
  7. Conclusion
  1. Introduction

The United Kingdom (UK) operates one of the oldest and most enduring political systems in the modern world. Its political framework combines monarchical tradition with parliamentary democracy, serving as a model for many Commonwealth countries. This answer will explore the core features of the UK’s political system and assess the efficacy of its participatory mechanisms in ensuring democratic governance and citizen involvement.

  1. Main Characteristics of the UK Political System
  2. Constitutional Monarchy
  • The monarch (currently King Charles III) is the ceremonial head of state.
  • Actual governance is carried out by the Prime Minister and elected Parliament.
  • The monarchy is politically neutral, offering symbolic unity and continuity.
  1. Parliamentary Sovereignty
  • The UK Parliament is supreme; it can make or repeal any law.
  • No court can override its legislation—no judicial review of Acts of Parliament.
  1. Unwritten Constitution
  • The UK does not have a single codified constitution.
  • Instead, it is based on:
    • Statutory laws (e.g., Human Rights Act 1998)
    • Common law (judicial decisions)
    • Constitutional conventions
    • Works of authority (e.g., Dicey’s Law of the Constitution)
  1. Bicameral Legislature
  • House of Commons: Elected members (MPs); main legislative power.
  • House of Lords: Appointed and hereditary peers; acts as a revising chamber.
  • Prime Minister is chosen from the majority in the House of Commons.
  1. Rule of Law
  • All individuals and institutions are subject to and equal before the law.
  • Judicial independence is safeguarded through constitutional conventions and reforms (e.g., Constitutional Reform Act 2005).
  1. Independent Judiciary
  • UK courts are independent and interpret the law fairly.
  • Supreme Court of the UK was established in 2009 to replace the House of Lords’ judicial functions.
  1. Devolution and Decentralization
  • Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland have devolved governments.
  • Local authorities and city councils manage public services and local policies.
  1. Mechanisms of Public Participation

Mechanism

Description

Impact

General Elections

Held every 5 years for House of Commons

Primary form of representation

Referenda

Direct public votes on key issues (e.g., Brexit)

Citizens express will directly

Petitions and Public Consultations

Public can petition Parliament; debates triggered at 100,000 signatures

Enhances direct democracy

Local Government Participation

Local councils elected by communities

Decentralizes decision-making

Pressure Groups and NGOs

Influence policies through campaigns

Empower citizen lobbying

Media and Civil Society

Public debates via BBC, newspapers, online forums

Strengthens political awareness

  1. Evaluation: Has the System Ensured Adequate Public Participation?

Successes:

  • Electoral Participation: Turnouts of over 60% in general elections show high voter engagement.
  • Referenda Culture: Scottish Independence (2014) and Brexit (2016) were landmark exercises in direct democracy.
  • Petitions and Public Inquiries: Platforms like “UK Parliament Petitions” website allow public input.
  • Parliamentary Broadcasts: Live telecasts and digital access to proceedings enhance transparency.
  • Constituency Linkage: MP–constituent connections are active through surgeries, letters, and online forums.

Inclusive Representation:

  • Parliament now has record levels of female and ethnic minority MPs (e.g., 225 women in 2019 election).
  • Youth engagement increasing via education programs and online platforms.
  1. Challenges and Limitations
  2. Unelected Second Chamber
  • House of Lords lacks democratic legitimacy—many members are appointed or hereditary.
  1. First-Past-The-Post System
  • Can result in disproportional representation. E.g., small parties receive fewer seats relative to votes (e.g., Green Party or UKIP).
  1. Devolution Inequality
  • England lacks a devolved legislature unlike Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland.
  • West Lothian Question: Scottish MPs vote on English laws, but not vice versa.
  1. Low Voter Turnout in Local Elections
  • Public engagement in local council elections remains low (often <40%).
  1. Digital Divide and Political Apathy
  • Despite online access, poorer and older populations may remain disengaged.
  1. Comparative Insight

Country

Public Participation Mechanism

Comparison with UK

USA

Presidential elections, midterms, ballot initiatives

More frequent direct elections but higher political polarization

Germany

Proportional representation system

Fairer representation than UK’s FPTP

France

Semi-presidential with referenda

Similar to UK’s direct vote use (e.g., Brexit)

India

Parliamentary democracy with federal structure

Greater emphasis on mass participation but weaker local devolution

  1. Conclusion

The United Kingdom’s political system—anchored in parliamentary democracy, rule of law, and constitutional monarchy—has evolved to include multiple mechanisms for public participation. While it has succeeded in engaging citizens at many levels, it still faces democratic deficits in areas such as House of Lords reform, electoral fairness, and devolution balance.

For a more inclusive and participatory political order, the UK must reform structural limitations, enhance civic education, and expand digital democracy without compromising institutional stability.

“A democracy is only as strong as its citizens’ ability to participate meaningfully.” – Lord Hailsham (Paraphrased)

Q3. Have Pakistan’s economic ties with other regional countries improved due to the infrastructure development projects undertaken under the China-Pakistan Economic corridor component of the BRI?

Outline

  1. Introduction
  2. Overview of BRI and CPEC
  3. CPEC’s Impact on Pakistan’s Regional Economic Ties
    • With China
    • With Afghanistan and Central Asia
    • With Iran
    • With India
    • With the Gulf States
  4. Regional Integration: Hype vs Reality
  5. Challenges Limiting Regional Economic Expansion
  6. Policy Recommendations
  7. Conclusion
  1. Introduction

The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), a flagship project of China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), promises to transform Pakistan into a regional economic hub. Launched in 2015, CPEC aims to link Gwadar Port in Pakistan to Xinjiang in China through infrastructure, energy, and trade development, involving over $60 billion in Chinese investments.

This answer explores whether CPEC has improved Pakistan’s economic ties with other regional countries, or whether the benefits remain largely bilateral and inward-focused.

  1. Overview of BRI and CPEC

Belt and Road Initiative (BRI):

  • Launched in 2013 by President Xi Jinping.
  • Encompasses 150+ countries, aiming to enhance trade, infrastructure, and connectivity.

CPEC:

  • Over 2,000 km of highways, railways, pipelines, and fiber-optics.
  • Divided into:
    • Early Harvest Projects (energy, roads)
    • Gwadar Port Development
    • Special Economic Zones (SEZs)
    • Long-Term Plan (up to 2030)
  1. CPEC’s Impact on Pakistan’s Regional Economic Ties
  2. With China – Strategic & Economic Deepening
  • Trade with China has grown (Pakistan’s imports from China reached $14.5 billion in 2022).
  • Joint ventures, Chinese industrial relocation, and energy cooperation expanded.
  • China has become Pakistan’s largest FDI source and second-largest trade partner.

“CPEC has elevated China-Pakistan ties to an ‘all-weather strategic cooperative partnership’.” – Chinese FM Wang Yi

  1. With Afghanistan and Central Asia
  • Improved road connectivity (e.g., N-50 highway from Gwadar to Chaman) opens up access to Afghanistan and CARs (Central Asian Republics).
  • Talks on linking CPEC to CASA-1000, TAPI gas pipeline, and Trans-Afghan Railways underway.
  • Pakistan promotes the Quadrilateral Traffic in Transit Agreement (QTTA) with CARs bypassing Afghanistan.

However:

  • Security instability and Taliban sanctions limit full-scale integration.
  • Afghanistan still largely trades through Iran’s Chabahar Port (India-sponsored).
  1. With Iran
  • Mixed signals. While Gwadar–Chabahar cooperation is promoted diplomatically, economic rivalry persists.
  • Iran sees potential in using CPEC routes for oil and gas exports, but U.S. sanctions on Iran have impeded joint infrastructure projects.
  • Recently, both countries have shown intent to boost border trade and rail links.
  1. With India
  • No improvement in ties due to India’s opposition to CPEC traversing Gilgit-Baltistan, which India claims.
  • India boycotted BRI, citing sovereignty issues.
  • Regional economic integration with India remains non-existent despite SAARC framework.
  1. With Gulf States
  • Saudi Arabia, UAE, and Qatar showed interest in investing in CPEC-linked energy and refinery projects (e.g., Aramco’s refinery in Gwadar).
  • CPEC routes could facilitate Gulf access to Central Asia.
  • However, these projects remain in early stages or have limited strategic clarity.
  1. Regional Integration: Hype vs. Reality

Country/Region

Improved Ties?

Evidence

China

✅

Increased FDI, bilateral trade, defense cooperation

Afghanistan/CARs

⚠️ Partial

High potential, low realization due to instability

Iran

⚠️ Limited

Political cooperation, but economic progress slow

India

❌

Strategic mistrust, no economic integration

Gulf States

✅/⚠️

Commitments made, but major projects pending

  1. Challenges Limiting Regional Economic Expansion
  2. Security Concerns
  • Militancy in Balochistan has led to targeted attacks on CPEC workers, raising concerns among regional investors.
  • Afghan instability deters trans-Afghan trade corridors.
  1. Regional Rivalries
  • India–Pakistan hostility limits SAARC integration.
  • Iran–Saudi tensions complicate trilateral cooperation.
  1. Infrastructure and Policy Bottlenecks
  • SEZs remain underdeveloped.
  • Border logistics, customs harmonization, and policy frameworks are under-optimized.
  1. Dependency on Bilateralism
  • CPEC remains largely a China–Pakistan bilateral initiative, rather than a truly multilateral framework.
  1. Policy Recommendations
  1. Expand Trilateral and Multilateral Engagements
    • Develop institutional linkages with CARs, Iran, and Gulf states beyond MOUs.
  2. Fast-Track SEZs and Industrial Zones
    • Make them regionally integrated manufacturing hubs.
  3. Security Reforms
    • Strengthen CPEC Authority and counter-terror strategies, especially in Balochistan.
  4. Include Afghanistan in Trade Corridors
    • Use soft diplomacy and regional summits to bring Taliban into regional economic vision.
  5. Engage Regional Institutions
    • Use platforms like ECO, SCO, and OIC for policy coordination and investment attraction.
  1. Conclusion

While CPEC has transformed China–Pakistan relations, its ability to significantly improve Pakistan’s economic ties with other regional countries remains limited but evolving. Geopolitical tensions, security challenges, and lack of multilateral coordination have slowed regional integration. However, the potential remains immense—if Pakistan can adopt inclusive economic diplomacy, accelerate internal development, and build strategic trust with neighbors, CPEC could yet serve as the engine for regional prosperity.

“CPEC cannot thrive in isolation; it must be regional in essence and inclusive in design.”

Q4. Bilateral relations with China are a pivotal component of Pakistan’s Foreign policy. What are the primary driving factors in this relationship?

Outline

  1. Introduction
  2. Historical Evolution of Pakistan–China Relations
  3. Primary Driving Factors in Bilateral Relations
    • Strategic and Security Cooperation
    • Economic and Trade Collaboration
    • Technological and Infrastructure Development (CPEC)
    • Diplomatic Convergence and Global Politics
    • Regional Stability and Counterbalance to India
    • Cultural and People-to-People Exchanges
  4. Case Studies and Institutional Agreements
  5. Challenges and Constraints
  6. Conclusion
  1. Introduction

China has long been termed “Pakistan’s Iron Brother”, and their bilateral relationship is regarded as one of the most consistent, strategic, and time-tested partnerships in Asia. From military cooperation in the 1960s to the present-day China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), the ties have deepened across multiple domains.

This answer identifies the core strategic, economic, diplomatic, and regional imperatives that make China an indispensable pillar of Pakistan’s foreign policy.

  1. Historical Evolution of Pakistan–China Relations
  • 1951: Diplomatic ties established.
  • 1963: Border Agreement signed, resolving territorial issues peacefully.
  • 1970s: Pakistan facilitated U.S.–China rapprochement (Kissinger’s secret visit).
  • 1990s–Present: Collaboration extended to nuclear technology, defense manufacturing, and Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) projects.

“A friendship higher than mountains, deeper than oceans, and sweeter than honey.” – Zhou Enlai on Sino-Pak ties

  1. Primary Driving Factors in Bilateral Relations
  2. Strategic and Security Cooperation
  • Defense Collaboration: Co-production of JF-17 Thunder jets, Al-Khalid tanks, and missile systems.
  • Military Training and Technology Transfers: Regular joint exercises (Shaheen series) and intelligence sharing.
  • Nuclear Cooperation: China helped build Pakistan’s Chashma Nuclear Power Plants.
  • Counterterrorism Support: Joint action plans and dialogue through SCO forums.

Area

Projects/Examples

Fighter Jets

JF-17 Thunder (PAC Kamra + China’s CAC)

Naval Expansion

Type-054A Frigates, submarines

Missiles

Cruise missile upgrades, radar systems

  1. Economic and Trade Collaboration
  • CPEC: Over $60 billion in investment, with projects in energy, transport, and infrastructure.
  • Trade Volume: Exceeds $17 billion annually, although it remains imbalanced in China’s favor.
  • Special Economic Zones (SEZs): Planned zones to attract Chinese manufacturing to Pakistan.
  • Currency Swap Agreements: Reduced dependence on USD in bilateral trade.
  1. Technological and Infrastructure Development (CPEC)
  • Energy Projects: ~5,300 MW added to national grid under early harvest projects.
  • Gwadar Port: Built and operated by China; considered the crown jewel of CPEC.
  • Telecommunications: Companies like Huawei and ZTE help develop Pakistan’s digital infrastructure.
  • Digital Silk Road: Collaboration on e-commerce, fiber optics, and surveillance systems.
  1. Diplomatic Convergence and Global Politics
  • UN Coordination: China has supported Pakistan’s position on Kashmir and blocked anti-Pakistan moves in UNSC sanctions committees.
  • BRI and Global South Solidarity: Both advocate multilateralism and development cooperation.
  • Opposition to Indian Hegemony: China acts as a balancing power in South Asia.
  1. Regional Stability and Counterbalance to India
  • China and Pakistan share concerns about Indian strategic ambitions, especially post-Galwan and Pulwama.
  • Strategic encirclement narrative: CPEC, military base talks, and maritime coordination via Gwadar–Djibouti axis.
  • Mutual concerns over Afghanistan’s instability and U.S. Indo-Pacific strategy.
  1. Cultural and People-to-People Exchanges
  • Confucius Institutes in Pakistan promoting Chinese language and culture.
  • Educational ties: Over 28,000 Pakistani students currently studying in China.
  • Media and Film Cooperation: Documentaries and co-productions spreading positive perceptions.
  1. Case Studies and Institutional Mechanisms

Mechanism

Purpose

China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC)

Infrastructure and economic integration

Pakistan–China Joint Cooperation Committee (JCC)

Oversight of CPEC implementation

China–Pakistan Strategic Dialogue

Political, diplomatic, and defense discussions

SCO Membership

Counterterrorism and regional coordination

  1. Challenges and Constraints
  2. Debt Dependency Concerns
  • CPEC loans have raised fears of debt-trap diplomacy, though these are exaggerated.
  1. Security Issues
  • Attacks on Chinese workers in Balochistan and Karachi (e.g., Confucius Institute bombing) threaten collaboration.
  1. Economic Asymmetry
  • Trade balance is heavily skewed in China’s favor; Pakistan struggles to increase exports.
  1. Global Pressures
  • Western concerns over BRI and China’s rising power put Pakistan in a strategic tightrope between blocs.
  1. Conclusion

China has become an anchor of Pakistan’s foreign policy due to deep-rooted ties in security, trade, infrastructure, and diplomacy. As global power structures shift and regional complexities increase, China remains Pakistan’s most reliable and future-oriented partner.

However, to maximize the benefits, Pakistan must pursue:

  • Balanced diplomacy
  • Economic diversification
  • Domestic stability and project transparency

“In the Asian Century, the China–Pakistan axis is not just strategic, but existential.” – Dr. Maleeha Lodhi

Q5. Provide an outline of Pakistan’s federal system of government. Why has such an approach been chosen? How successful has it been in ensuring administrative efficiency?

Outline

  1. Introduction
  2. Outline of Pakistan’s Federal System
    • Constitutional Structure
    • Institutions and Power Sharing
    • Financial Federalism
    • Role of Provinces
  3. Why Federalism Was Chosen in Pakistan
    • Historical, Ethnic, and Regional Diversity
    • Learning from Partition
    • Balancing Central Authority with Provincial Autonomy
  4. Assessment of Administrative Efficiency
    • Achievements
    • Challenges and Structural Inefficiencies
  5. Post-18th Amendment Evaluation
  6. Recommendations for Strengthening Federalism
  7. Conclusion
  1. Introduction

Pakistan is a federal parliamentary republic, as envisioned in its Constitution of 1973. The federal system divides powers between the central government and four provinces, with the aim of ensuring inclusive governance, unity in diversity, and administrative decentralization.

This answer outlines Pakistan’s federal system, discusses why it was adopted, and evaluates its success in delivering administrative efficiency.

  1. Outline of Pakistan’s Federal System
  2. Constitutional Structure
  • Federal system formalized under the 1973 Constitution.
  • Article 1 defines Pakistan as a Federal Republic comprising:
    • The Federation of Pakistan
    • Four Provinces: Punjab, Sindh, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Balochistan
    • Federal territories (e.g., Islamabad, GB, AJK with varying degrees of autonomy)
  1. Institutions and Power Sharing

Institution

Role in Federal System

National Assembly

Represents population; law-making for federation

Senate

Equal representation for provinces

Council of Common Interests (CCI)

Resolves federal-provincial disputes

National Finance Commission (NFC)

Distributes financial resources fairly

  1. Federal Lists Before and After 18th Amendment
  • Concurrent Legislative List abolished in 2010 under 18th Amendment.
  • Provinces now have autonomy over education, health, culture, local governments, etc.
  1. Financial Federalism
  • NFC Award (Article 160): Distributes federal revenues.
  • 7th NFC Award (2009): Increased provincial share to 57.5% of divisible pool.
  1. Why Federalism Was Chosen in Pakistan
  2. Ethnic and Linguistic Diversity
  • Major ethnic groups: Punjabis, Sindhis, Pashtuns, Baloch, Saraikis.
  • A unitary model could not accommodate such pluralism.
  1. Colonial and Partition Legacy
  • One reason for East Pakistan’s secession in 1971 was overcentralization.
  • The federal structure aimed to avoid marginalization of smaller provinces.
  1. Ensuring Balanced Development
  • Needed for equal opportunity and development across less-developed provinces, e.g., Balochistan and Southern KP.
  1. Democratic Inclusion
  • Provincial autonomy encourages local political participation and responsive governance.
  1. Assessment of Administrative Efficiency
  2. Achievements
  • Greater autonomy post-18th Amendment has enabled tailored policies.
  • Provincial governments have increased focus on education, health, and policing.
  • Localized responses to disasters like floods, COVID-19, and polio eradication.
  1. Challenges and Inefficiencies

Issue

Explanation

Weak Institutional Capacity

Provinces lack trained human resource and systems

Intergovernmental Conflicts

Federal–provincial disputes (e.g., gas, water)

Delayed CCI Meetings

Undermines cooperative federalism

Uneven Development

Punjab still dominates; other provinces complain

Fiscal Mismanagement

Poor utilization of funds; lack of transparency

  1. Post-18th Amendment Evaluation

The 18th Constitutional Amendment (2010) was a major milestone for federalism in Pakistan.

Positives:

  • Devolution of 47 subjects to provinces.
  • Autonomy in service delivery and budget allocation.
  • Provinces now frame their own education policies, e.g., Sindh Education Policy 2022.

Limitations:

  • Weak local governments – provinces reluctant to share power further.
  • Lack of interprovincial harmony on national issues like NFC updates and water disputes.
  1. Recommendations for Strengthening Federalism
  1. Institutionalize Local Governments
    • Fully implement Articles 140-A and 32 of the Constitution.
  2. Reform CCI and NFC Mechanisms
    • Make CCI permanent and increase meeting frequency.
    • Update NFC Awards every five years as per constitutional requirement.
  3. Capacity Building of Provinces
    • Invest in civil service training, data systems, and project monitoring.
  4. Enhance Fiscal Transparency
    • Introduce performance-based budgeting.
  5. Promote Interprovincial Coordination
    • Through Senate Committees, interprovincial councils, and media discourse.
  1. Conclusion

Pakistan’s adoption of a federal system was essential given its ethnic makeup, historical context, and democratic aspirations. While the framework has improved governance in principle, its administrative success remains mixed due to capacity gaps, financial disputes, and political mistrust.

The 18th Amendment revived true federalism, but unless fully implemented and supported by institutional maturity and political will, Pakistan’s federal system will fall short of delivering efficient and equitable governance.

“True federalism is not just about power-sharing but about building trust and cooperation in a diverse polity.”

Q6. Has the World Trade Organization (WTO) been successful in ensuring that global trade remains beneficial to most states/units in the international system?

Outline

  1. Introduction
  2. Objectives and Structure of the WTO
  3. Successes of WTO in Promoting Global Trade
    • Trade Liberalization
    • Dispute Settlement Mechanism
    • Integration of Developing Countries
    • Stability and Predictability
  4. Criticism and Limitations
    • Inequality in Benefits
    • Agricultural Protectionism
    • Developing Countries’ Marginalization
    • Institutional Paralysis
  5. Case Studies: Successes and Failures
  6. Recent Challenges: Geopolitics, Protectionism, and COVID-19
  7. Reforms Needed for Inclusive Global Trade
  8. Conclusion
  1. Introduction

The World Trade Organization (WTO) was established in 1995 to replace the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). With over 160 member states, its central aim is to ensure global trade flows freely, fairly, and predictably.

The question remains: Has the WTO made global trade beneficial to most states, or has it favored the powerful and marginalized the weak?

  1. Objectives and Structure of the WTO

Core Objectives:

  • Promote trade liberalization
  • Resolve trade disputes
  • Ensure transparency and predictability
  • Assist developing countries

Structure:

  • Ministerial Conference (top decision-making body)
  • General Council, Dispute Settlement Body (DSB)
  • Various committees on trade in goods, services, IP rights, etc.
  1. Successes of WTO in Promoting Global Trade
  2. Trade Liberalization
  • WTO succeeded in reducing global tariffs.
  • Facilitated global trade growth: from $5.1 trillion in 1995 to over $28 trillion in 2023 (WTO Report).

“The WTO has played a pivotal role in integrating nations into the world economy.” – Pascal Lamy, Former WTO DG

  1. Dispute Settlement Mechanism (DSM)
  • The WTO’s DSM is often cited as its crown jewel.
  • Over 600 disputes resolved, preventing trade wars (e.g., Boeing-Airbus, U.S.–EU steel tariffs).
  1. Integration of Developing Countries
  • Allowed LDCs (Least Developed Countries) access to technical assistance and longer timelines for compliance.
  • China (2001) and Vietnam (2007) joined under terms that helped their economic integration.
  1. Predictability and Transparency
  • WTO binds countries to agreed tariff levels, limiting unilateral changes and promoting investment.
  1. Criticism and Limitations
  2. Inequality in Trade Benefits
  • Developed countries benefit disproportionately.
  • Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia contribute only a small share of global trade and face high entry barriers.
  1. Agricultural Protectionism
  • WTO failed to eliminate agricultural subsidies in the Global North.
  • EU and US continue to subsidize farmers, distorting global competition.

Region

Farm Subsidies (Annual)

USA

$50 billion (USDA, 2022)

EU

€60 billion (CAP subsidies)

Pakistan

Less than $1 billion

  1. Developing Countries’ Marginalization
  • Doha Development Round (2001) aimed to rebalance trade in favor of the poor, but negotiations have stalled.
  • WTO rules often limit state intervention, hurting domestic industries in developing nations.
  1. Institutional Paralysis
  • Dispute Appellate Body is non-functional since 2019 due to US veto of appointments.
  • WTO unable to address emerging issues like e-commerce, digital trade, and climate-linked tariffs.
  1. Case Studies: Successes and Failures

Success – China

  • WTO accession helped China emerge as a global manufacturing hub.
  • China’s exports grew from $250 billion (2001) to over $3.6 trillion (2023).

Failure – Sub-Saharan Africa

  • African nations remain commodity exporters, vulnerable to price shocks.
  • WTO rules restrict infant industry protection needed for structural transformation.
  1. Recent Challenges: Geopolitics, Protectionism, and COVID-19
  • US-China trade war bypassed WTO mechanisms, undermining its authority.
  • COVID-19 disrupted supply chains, and rich countries hoarded medical supplies and vaccines.
  • WTO’s Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) hindered global vaccine equity.

“The WTO risks irrelevance unless it reforms to reflect a multipolar and digital world.” – Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, WTO Director-General

  1. Reforms Needed for Inclusive Global Trade
  1. Revive Dispute Settlement Body (DSB)
    • Urgently appoint appellate judges to restore rule enforcement.
  2. Rebalance Agricultural Trade Rules
    • Enforce stricter limits on subsidies in the Global North.
  3. Support Developing Countries
    • Expand Aid for Trade, technology transfers, and flexibility clauses.
  4. Modernize WTO Mandate
    • Incorporate climate resilience, e-commerce, and digital taxation.
  5. Encourage South-South Cooperation
    • Strengthen regional trade blocs under WTO umbrella (e.g., AfCFTA, SAFTA).
  1. Conclusion

While the WTO has contributed significantly to trade expansion, dispute resolution, and multilateral rule-making, its benefits have not been evenly distributed. Developed countries have shaped and benefitted from the rules disproportionately, while many developing and least developed nations remain marginalized.

To ensure global trade becomes more inclusive and equitable, the WTO must undergo deep structural reforms, reflect 21st-century realities, and genuinely empower smaller economies.

“Trade should be a tool for development, not domination.”

Q7. Provide an assessment of how Quaid-e-Azam (Mohammad Ali Jinnah) employed political legalism to strengthen and legitimate the drive towards the creation of Pakistan.

Outline

  1. Introduction
  2. Objectives and Structure of the WTO
  3. Successes of WTO in Promoting Global Trade
    • Trade Liberalization
    • Dispute Settlement Mechanism
    • Integration of Developing Countries
    • Stability and Predictability
  4. Criticism and Limitations
    • Inequality in Benefits
    • Agricultural Protectionism
    • Developing Countries’ Marginalization
    • Institutional Paralysis
  5. Case Studies: Successes and Failures
  6. Recent Challenges: Geopolitics, Protectionism, and COVID-19
  7. Reforms Needed for Inclusive Global Trade
  8. Conclusion
  1. Introduction

The World Trade Organization (WTO) was established in 1995 to replace the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). With over 160 member states, its central aim is to ensure global trade flows freely, fairly, and predictably.

The question remains: Has the WTO made global trade beneficial to most states, or has it favored the powerful and marginalized the weak?

  1. Objectives and Structure of the WTO

Core Objectives:

  • Promote trade liberalization
  • Resolve trade disputes
  • Ensure transparency and predictability
  • Assist developing countries

Structure:

  • Ministerial Conference (top decision-making body)
  • General Council, Dispute Settlement Body (DSB)
  • Various committees on trade in goods, services, IP rights, etc.
  1. Successes of WTO in Promoting Global Trade
  2. Trade Liberalization
  • WTO succeeded in reducing global tariffs.
  • Facilitated global trade growth: from $5.1 trillion in 1995 to over $28 trillion in 2023 (WTO Report).

“The WTO has played a pivotal role in integrating nations into the world economy.” – Pascal Lamy, Former WTO DG

  1. Dispute Settlement Mechanism (DSM)
  • The WTO’s DSM is often cited as its crown jewel.
  • Over 600 disputes resolved, preventing trade wars (e.g., Boeing-Airbus, U.S.–EU steel tariffs).
  1. Integration of Developing Countries
  • Allowed LDCs (Least Developed Countries) access to technical assistance and longer timelines for compliance.
  • China (2001) and Vietnam (2007) joined under terms that helped their economic integration.
  1. Predictability and Transparency
  • WTO binds countries to agreed tariff levels, limiting unilateral changes and promoting investment.
  1. Criticism and Limitations
  2. Inequality in Trade Benefits
  • Developed countries benefit disproportionately.
  • Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia contribute only a small share of global trade and face high entry barriers.
  1. Agricultural Protectionism
  • WTO failed to eliminate agricultural subsidies in the Global North.
  • EU and US continue to subsidize farmers, distorting global competition.

Region

Farm Subsidies (Annual)

USA

$50 billion (USDA, 2022)

EU

€60 billion (CAP subsidies)

Pakistan

Less than $1 billion

  1. Developing Countries’ Marginalization
  • Doha Development Round (2001) aimed to rebalance trade in favor of the poor, but negotiations have stalled.
  • WTO rules often limit state intervention, hurting domestic industries in developing nations.
  1. Institutional Paralysis
  • Dispute Appellate Body is non-functional since 2019 due to US veto of appointments.
  • WTO unable to address emerging issues like e-commerce, digital trade, and climate-linked tariffs.
  1. Case Studies: Successes and Failures

Success – China

  • WTO accession helped China emerge as a global manufacturing hub.
  • China’s exports grew from $250 billion (2001) to over $3.6 trillion (2023).

Failure – Sub-Saharan Africa

  • African nations remain commodity exporters, vulnerable to price shocks.
  • WTO rules restrict infant industry protection needed for structural transformation.
  1. Recent Challenges: Geopolitics, Protectionism, and COVID-19
  • US-China trade war bypassed WTO mechanisms, undermining its authority.
  • COVID-19 disrupted supply chains, and rich countries hoarded medical supplies and vaccines.
  • WTO’s Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) hindered global vaccine equity.

“The WTO risks irrelevance unless it reforms to reflect a multipolar and digital world.” – Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, WTO Director-General

  1. Reforms Needed for Inclusive Global Trade
  1. Revive Dispute Settlement Body (DSB)
    • Urgently appoint appellate judges to restore rule enforcement.
  2. Rebalance Agricultural Trade Rules
    • Enforce stricter limits on subsidies in the Global North.
  3. Support Developing Countries
    • Expand Aid for Trade, technology transfers, and flexibility clauses.
  4. Modernize WTO Mandate
    • Incorporate climate resilience, e-commerce, and digital taxation.
  5. Encourage South-South Cooperation
    • Strengthen regional trade blocs under WTO umbrella (e.g., AfCFTA, SAFTA).
  1. Conclusion

While the WTO has contributed significantly to trade expansion, dispute resolution, and multilateral rule-making, its benefits have not been evenly distributed. Developed countries have shaped and benefitted from the rules disproportionately, while many developing and least developed nations remain marginalized.

To ensure global trade becomes more inclusive and equitable, the WTO must undergo deep structural reforms, reflect 21st-century realities, and genuinely empower smaller economies.

“Trade should be a tool for development, not domination.”

Q8. What role have ideological factors played in the conceptualization of Pakistan’s foreign policy?

Outline

  1. Introduction
  2. Understanding Ideology in Foreign Policy
  3. Foundational Ideological Pillars of Pakistan
  4. Phases of Pakistan’s Foreign Policy Influenced by Ideology
    • Early Islamic Solidarity (1947–1958)
    • Islamic World Leadership and the Cold War (1958–1971)
    • Post-1971 Identity Consolidation
    • Afghan Jihad and Pan-Islamism (1980s)
    • Post-9/11 Pragmatism vs Ideology
  5. Contemporary Reflection of Ideological Factors
    • OIC and Muslim Causes
    • Kashmir and Ummah narrative
    • Islamic identity vs Regional Realpolitik
  6. Tensions Between Ideology and National Interest
  7. Assessment: Strengths and Pitfalls of Ideology in Foreign Policy
  8. Conclusion
  1. Introduction

Pakistan’s foreign policy has been shaped by a unique blend of ideological commitments and pragmatic considerations. Founded on the basis of Muslim identity and Two-Nation Theory, ideology has played a crucial role in guiding Pakistan’s external relations—especially with the Muslim world and on issues like Kashmir.

However, this ideological orientation has also created dilemmas when it conflicted with national interests, economic needs, and geopolitical realities.

  1. Understanding Ideology in Foreign Policy

Ideology in foreign policy refers to the use of state beliefs, values, and identity to shape diplomatic behavior. In Pakistan’s case, ideology often means:

  • Islamic solidarity
  • Support for Muslim causes globally
  • Preservation of Islamic identity in international relations
  1. Foundational Ideological Pillars of Pakistan
  • Two-Nation Theory: Defined Pakistan as a separate homeland for Muslims of South Asia.
  • Islamic Identity: Early leaders like Quaid-e-Azam emphasized Pakistan as a modern Muslim democracy with close ties to the Muslim world.
  • Constitutional Reflections: The Objectives Resolution (1949) and subsequent constitutions reinforced Islam as a guiding principle of statehood and foreign policy.
  1. Phases of Pakistan’s Foreign Policy Influenced by Ideology
  2. Early Islamic Solidarity (1947–1958)
  • Pakistan sought to lead the Muslim world as a voice for Islamic unity.
  • Initiated efforts to form an Islamic bloc with countries like Egypt, Iran, and Saudi Arabia.
  • Supported Palestinian cause in the UN and rejected relations with Israel.
  1. Islamic World Leadership and the Cold War (1958–1971)
  • Despite joining Western alliances like SEATO and CENTO, Pakistan continued to frame its policy around Islamic unity.
  • Ayub Khan’s diplomacy sought prestige as a moderate Islamic state.
  • Helped mediate in Arab disputes and retained close ties with Jordan, Iraq, and Iran.
  1. Post-1971 Identity Consolidation
  • The breakup of East Pakistan in 1971 created an identity crisis, making ideology more prominent.
  • Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto hosted the OIC Summit (1974) in Lahore, emphasizing Pakistan’s role in pan-Islamism.
  • Pakistan was among the first to recognize the PLO, aligning ideology with foreign relations.
  1. Afghan Jihad and Pan-Islamism (1980s)
  • Ideology became a tool of statecraft as Pakistan joined the US-backed Afghan jihad.
  • Promoted a jihadi narrative, trained mujahideen, and projected Islamic solidarity with Afghans.
  • Ideological commitment blurred lines between strategic depth and religious activism.
  1. Post-9/11 Pragmatism vs Ideology
  • Under Musharraf, Pakistan faced a clash between strategic realignment with the US and Islamic ideological rhetoric.
  • Though it supported the War on Terror, it struggled to manage ideological backlash domestically.
  • Ideology was toned down in favor of realpolitik but retained in official discourse.
  1. Contemporary Reflection of Ideological Factors
  2. Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC)
  • Pakistan is an active member and uses the OIC platform to advocate for Kashmir, Palestine, and Islamophobia.
  • Hosts and attends summits with Islamic themes (e.g., Kuala Lumpur Summit 2019).
  1. Kashmir and the Ummah Narrative
  • Pakistan’s position on Indian-occupied Kashmir is framed as both a legal dispute and an Islamic obligation.
  • Ideological language (e.g., “brothers in faith”) is used in public diplomacy and UN forums.
  1. Islamic Identity vs Regional Realpolitik
  • Close ties with China (a secular communist state) show pragmatism often overrides ideology.
  • Relations with Iran and Saudi Arabia are managed carefully despite sectarian tensions.
  1. Tensions Between Ideology and National Interest

Ideological Position

Pragmatic Challenge

Support for Palestine

Limited ties with Israel restrict economic/diplomatic options

Refusal to recognize Israel

Missed trade and tech opportunities seen by Arab states

Islamic bloc leadership

Internal divisions (e.g., with UAE, Saudi, Iran)

Afghanistan depth strategy

Backfired in the form of extremism and terrorism

  1. Assessment: Strengths and Pitfalls of Ideology in Foreign Policy

Strengths

  • Helped mobilize domestic and international support for Kashmir and Palestine
  • Fostered ties with Muslim-majority countries, especially in the Middle East
  • Strengthened national unity and Islamic identity during critical phases

Pitfalls

  • At times isolated Pakistan from global consensus
  • Restricted diplomatic flexibility with non-Muslim countries
  • Led to conflicting narratives in foreign policy (e.g., relations with West vs Ummah)
  1. Conclusion

Ideological factors have played a pivotal role in shaping Pakistan’s foreign policy, especially in defining its identity, alliances, and global positioning. From supporting pan-Islamism to championing Muslim causes, ideology gave moral and political direction to Pakistan’s diplomacy.

However, in the evolving international system, rigid ideological postures must be balanced with economic priorities, regional stability, and pragmatic diplomacy. A constructive fusion of ideology and realism is essential for Pakistan to safeguard national interests while staying true to its founding vision.

“Foreign policy, like any policy, is a matter of balancing values with interests, and in Pakistan’s case, that balance is often weighed between Islam and realism.” – Dr. Moeed Yusuf

. c Political Science -II 2024 Political Science -II 2024 Political Science -II 2024 Political Science -II 2024 Political Science -II 2024 Political Science -II 2024 Political Science -II 2024 Political Science -II 2024 Political Science -II 2024 Political Science -II 2024 Political Science -II 2024 Political Science -II 2024 Political Science -II 2024 Political Science -II 2024 

You cannot copy content of this pages.