Css 2019

Log In

Indo Pak History 2021

Q.2: Discuss the Sway of Sufism in 13th Century A.D.

Outline

  1. Introduction
  2. Historical Context: Political and Social Conditions of the 13th Century
  3. Meaning and Philosophy of Sufism
  4. Arrival and Establishment of Sufi Silsilas in India
    • Chishtiyya Order
    • Suhrawardiyya Order
  5. Key Sufi Saints and Their Influence
    • Khwaja Moinuddin Chishti
    • Baba Fariduddin Ganj Shakar
    • Bahauddin Zakariya
    • Lal Shahbaz Qalandar
  6. Role of Khanqahs (Sufi Hospices)
  7. Sufism’s Social and Cultural Impact
  8. Political Role and Attitudes Toward Authority
  9. Spread of Islam Through Sufism
  10. Critical Analysis
  11. Conclusion
  1. Introduction

The 13th century A.D. marked a crucial phase in the consolidation of Islamic influence in the Indian subcontinent, particularly through the spread of Sufism. Unlike formal religious scholars or military conquerors, the Sufis—mystical Islamic saints—won the hearts of the common people through love, simplicity, tolerance, and spiritual magnetism. Their teachings and practices had a deep, transformative sway over Indian society, particularly in north-western India and the Gangetic plains. This period laid the foundation for a syncretic Indo-Islamic culture that shaped religious and social life for centuries.

  1. Historical Context: Political and Social Conditions of the 13th Century
  • The century began with the Ghurid conquests and the establishment of the Delhi Sultanate (1206) by Qutb-ud-Din Aibak.
  • Political instability, dynastic conflicts, and Mongol invasions (from the west) created social unrest, poverty, and spiritual anxiety.
  • The caste system and Brahmanical orthodoxy excluded large segments of society from religious participation.
  • In this context, Sufism offered an accessible and egalitarian path to spirituality, drawing in people from all walks of life.
  1. Meaning and Philosophy of Sufism
  • Sufism is the mystical dimension of Islam, emphasizing inner purification, divine love, detachment from materialism, and direct experience of God (ma’rifah).
  • Based on Qur’anic spirituality, it combines elements of:
    • Zuhd (asceticism)
    • Tawakkul (trust in God)
    • Ihsan (excellence in worship)
  • Sufis pursued tariqa (path) under a spiritual master (pir) and emphasized service, humility, and love for humanity.
  1. Arrival and Establishment of Sufi Silsilas in India
  2. a) Chishtiyya Order
  • Originated in Central Asia and introduced to India by Khwaja Moinuddin Chishti.
  • Emphasized love, tolerance, and service to the poor.
  • Rejected state patronage and political involvement.
  • Spread rapidly in Ajmer, Delhi, and Punjab.
  1. b) Suhrawardiyya Order
  • Brought by Bahauddin Zakariya of Multan, this order originated in Baghdad.
  • Accepted limited association with political elites but remained focused on spiritual and scholarly pursuits.
  • Strong presence in Multan, Uchh, and Sindh.
  1. Key Sufi Saints and Their Influence
  2. a) Khwaja Moinuddin Chishti (1142–1236)
  • Settled in Ajmer, he is revered as the spiritual pioneer of Indian Sufism.
  • Preached universal love and humility.
  • Known as Gharib Nawaz (benefactor of the poor).
  • His shrine at Ajmer became a major pilgrimage site.

“Love all and hate none. Mere talk of peace will avail you naught.” – Khwaja Moinuddin Chishti

  1. b) Baba Fariduddin Ganj Shakar (1173–1266)
  • Based in Pakpattan, a disciple of Khwaja Qutbuddin Bakhtiar Kaki.
  • First major Punjabi-language poet and Sufi.
  • His verses were later included in the Guru Granth Sahib, reflecting his inter-religious appeal.
  1. c) Bahauddin Zakariya (1182–1268)
  • Established Suhrawardiyya order in Multan.
  • Known for scholarship and Sufi training.
  • His Khanqah became a hub for learning and diplomacy.
  1. d) Lal Shahbaz Qalandar (1177–1274)
  • Based in Sehwan, Sindh.
  • A syncretic saint known for his ecstatic practices and inclusivity.
  • His shrine remains a symbol of interfaith unity in Sindh.
  1. Role of Khanqahs (Sufi Hospices)
  • Khanqahs served as spiritual centers, community kitchens, hospitals, and schools.
  • Provided refuge for travelers, orphans, and the destitute.
  • Fostered interfaith dialogue, especially with Hindus and Buddhists.
  • The Sufi practice of sama (music and poetry) attracted large gatherings and spiritual seekers.
  1. Sufism’s Social and Cultural Impact
  • Fostered communal harmony by preaching love beyond religious boundaries.
  • Reached low-caste Hindus and marginalized groups excluded from orthodox Brahmanism.
  • Promoted vernacular languages like Punjabi, Sindhi, Hindavi, aiding in the evolution of regional literature.
  • Influenced local customs, festivals, and even architectural forms (e.g., Sufi shrines, domes, minarets).
  1. Political Role and Attitudes Toward Authority
  • The Chishti Sufis generally maintained distance from the state, refusing royal gifts and positions.
    • Example: Nizamuddin Auliya refused to meet Sultan Alauddin Khilji.
  • The Suhrawardis, however, were more pragmatic:
    • Bahauddin Zakariya had cordial ties with the Delhi Sultanate, helping mediate disputes.
  • Sufis occasionally acted as intermediaries during crises, wars, or famines.
  1. Spread of Islam Through Sufism
  • Sufis played a pivotal role in the peaceful spread of Islam in India.
  • Their spiritual magnetism, charity, and message of equality converted many to Islam without force.
  • Islam’s growth was not through sword, but through heart-to-heart transmission, especially in Punjab, Bengal, Sindh, and Kashmir.

“It was not the sword that won a place for Islam, but the sword of the spirit.” — Arnold Toynbee

  1. Critical Analysis

Positive Contributions

Criticism

Promoted tolerance and pluralism

Some critics argue syncretism diluted Islamic orthodoxy

Fostered regional languages and poetry

Certain ecstatic Sufis (like Qalandars) were seen as heretical by the orthodox

Provided social services and education

Dependency on Khanqahs sometimes discouraged critical scholarship

Countered caste oppression

Limited influence on ruling elites and policies

Despite these critiques, Sufism’s inclusive ethos, cultural flexibility, and emotional depth made it uniquely successful in the Indian milieu.

  1. Conclusion

In the 13th century A.D., Sufism emerged as the most vibrant spiritual force in the Indian subcontinent. Amidst political turmoil and religious rigidity, the Sufi saints brought solace, community, and spiritual hope to the masses. Their humanitarian ideals, poetic teachings, and deeply inclusive practices shaped the very fabric of Indo-Islamic civilization. The legacy of these saints lives on, not just in shrines, but in the values of tolerance, coexistence, and mysticism they nurtured—a legacy that continues to inspire generations in South Asia.

Q.3: Estimate the Hindu Reformist and Political Movements of the 19th and 20th Century A.D. and Their Impact on Muslim Society and Politics

Outline

  1. Introduction
  2. Socio-Political Context of British India
  3. Major Hindu Reformist Movements
    • Brahmo Samaj (1828)
    • Arya Samaj (1875)
    • Ramakrishna Mission (1897)
    • Theosophical Society (1875 in USA; 1879 in India)
  4. Major Hindu Political Movements
    • Indian National Congress (1885)
    • Hindu Mahasabha (1915)
    • Cow Protection Movement
    • Shuddhi and Sangathan Movements
    • RSS (1925)
  5. Impact on Muslim Society
    • Religious Awareness and Counter-Reform
    • Rise of Muslim Reformist Movements (e.g., Aligarh Movement, Deoband)
  6. Impact on Muslim Politics
    • Demand for Separate Electorates (1906–1909)
    • Two-Nation Theory and Muslim League (1906)
    • Role in Strengthening Muslim Identity
    • Fueling Hindu-Muslim Political Divide
  7. Critical Evaluation
  8. Conclusion
  1. Introduction

The 19th and 20th centuries witnessed a wave of Hindu reformist and political mobilization in response to colonial modernity, social decay, and Western influence. While many of these movements were initially religious and social in nature, they later acquired political overtones that significantly shaped communal identities in British India. As Hindu groups redefined their religious practices and organized politically, Muslims responded with parallel movements to preserve their religious, cultural, and political distinctiveness. These interactions laid the groundwork for Hindu-Muslim rivalry that culminated in the partition of India in 1947.

  1. Socio-Political Context of British India
  • The East India Company’s consolidation of power by the early 19th century weakened traditional religious institutions.
  • Western education and Christian missionary activity created intellectual upheaval among Hindus and Muslims.
  • The British racial and cultural superiority complex, combined with their policy of non-intervention post-1857, encouraged community-based social reform.
  • In this setting, Hindu reformist movements arose to modernize Hindu society, followed by political mobilization to assert dominance in the colonial polity.
  1. Major Hindu Reformist Movements
  2. a) Brahmo Samaj (Founded 1828 by Raja Ram Mohan Roy)
  • Sought to reform Hinduism by rejecting idol worship, caste discrimination, and polytheism.
  • Emphasized monotheism, rationality, and education.
  • Encouraged women’s rights, including widow remarriage and education.

“The Brahmo Samaj aimed to reconcile Hinduism with modern values.” – Stanley Wolpert

  1. b) Arya Samaj (Founded 1875 by Swami Dayanand Saraswati)
  • Advocated return to the Vedas and purification of Hinduism.
  • Rejected idol worship, caste-by-birth, and foreign influence.
  • Initiated Shuddhi (re-conversion) campaigns aimed at bringing Muslims and Christians back to Hinduism.
  • Became militant in tone, sparking communal friction.
  1. c) Ramakrishna Mission (Founded 1897 by Swami Vivekananda)
  • Emphasized practical Vedanta, spirituality, and service to humanity.
  • Focused on inter-religious harmony, although politically it promoted Hindu revivalism.
  1. d) Theosophical Society (Came to India in 1879)
  • Founded in New York by Madame Blavatsky and Colonel Olcott.
  • Promoted esoteric Hindu philosophy and Indian spiritual superiority.
  • Influential among the educated Hindu elite, including Annie Besant.
  1. Major Hindu Political Movements
  2. a) Indian National Congress (1885)
  • Started as a secular platform, but dominated by Hindu elite.
  • Early leaders (e.g., B.G. Tilak, Lala Lajpat Rai) used Hindu symbolism (e.g., Ganesh Utsav, Shivaji cult).
  • By early 20th century, became increasingly aligned with Hindu majority aspirations.
  1. b) Hindu Mahasabha (1915)
  • Established to protect Hindu interests and promote Hindu unity.
  • Opposed concessions to Muslims (like separate electorates).
  • Championed Akhand Bharat (Undivided India) and Hindu Rashtra ideology.
  1. c) Cow Protection Movement (Late 19th century)
  • Aimed to ban cow slaughter, seen as sacred by Hindus.
  • Sparked communal riots, especially in Uttar Pradesh and Bihar.
  • Strengthened the divide between Hindu vegetarian customs and Muslim meat consumption.
  1. d) Shuddhi and Sangathan Movements
  • Shuddhi (purification): Campaign to re-convert Muslims and Christians to Hinduism.
  • Sangathan (consolidation): Organized Hindu society against “foreign religions”.
  • Provoked Muslim counter-movements and deepened communal mistrust.
  1. e) Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh – RSS (1925)
  • Founded by K.B. Hedgewar, aimed at creating a Hindu militant identity.
  • Rejected secular nationalism and viewed Muslims as “outsiders”.
  • Became a cultural army to enforce Hindu supremacy.
  1. Impact on Muslim Society
  2. a) Religious Awareness and Counter-Reform
  • In response to Hindu reformist zeal, Muslims started movements like:
    • Deoband Movement (1866): Islamic orthodoxy and traditional education.
    • Aligarh Movement (1875): Led by Sir Syed Ahmad Khan to modernize Muslim education.
    • Barelvi Movement: Emphasized Sufi practices and shrine culture.
  • Religious identity sharpened, as Muslims felt threatened by Hindu proselytization and reform.
  1. b) Rise of Muslim Religious Institutions
  • Madrassas, mosques, and printing presses were established to preserve Islamic learning.
  • Urdu press became an important medium for Muslim revivalism and discourse.
  1. Impact on Muslim Politics
  2. a) Demand for Separate Electorates
  • Arya Samaj’s militant tone and Congress’s Hindu leanings convinced Muslims they needed political safeguards.
  • Muslim League (1906) demanded separate electorates, granted by Minto-Morley Reforms (1909).
  1. b) Strengthening of Two-Nation Theory
  • Shuddhi and Sangathan campaigns, cow protection violence, and Congress’s disregard for Muslim interests led to the idea that Hindus and Muslims were two separate nations.
  • Allama Iqbal’s 1930 Allahabad Address reflected this realization.

“The political resurgence of Hindus turned the Muslim mind toward a separate national identity.” – Dr. Ishtiaq Husain Qureshi

  1. c) Muslim League’s Rise
  • As Congress became more majoritarian, the Muslim League emerged as the voice of Muslim political identity.
  • Events like the Nehru Report (1928) and Congress ministries’ anti-Muslim policies (1937–39) reinforced Muslim separatism.
  1. d) Demand for Pakistan
  • The cumulative effect of Hindu reformism, revivalism, and majoritarian politics led to the Lahore Resolution of 1940, demanding separate Muslim homelands.
  1. Critical Evaluation

Hindu Reformism

Effect on Muslims

Promoted literacy and rationality

Encouraged Muslim modernization (e.g., Aligarh)

Caste reform and women’s rights

Inspired Muslim social reform

Assertive revivalism

Triggered Muslim identity movements

Cow protection, Shuddhi

Created fear, conflict, and polarization

Political dominance in Congress

Justified Muslim League’s claim for safeguards

While some Hindu movements helped modernize Indian society, others, especially in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, fueled communalism. They made Muslim political isolation inevitable, leading to the eventual partition of the subcontinent.

  1. Conclusion

The Hindu reformist and political movements of the 19th and 20th centuries had a profound impact on the trajectory of Muslim society and politics in South Asia. While some movements aimed at social uplift and religious purification, others became vehicles of Hindu nationalism, alienating the Muslim community. The Muslim response came in the form of religious revival, educational reform, and ultimately, political separatism. The interplay of communal assertions, rather than harmony, shaped the last phase of British India—culminating in the creation of Pakistan in 1947.

Q.4: Explain in Detail the Sufferings of the Muslims under the Congress Ministries’ Rule. How Did the Muslims Celebrate Their Resignation in 1939?

Outline

  1. Introduction
  2. Formation of Congress Ministries (1937–1939)
  3. Overview of Muslim Expectations vs. Reality
  4. Sufferings of Muslims under Congress Rule
    • Administrative Discrimination
    • Cultural and Religious Suppression
    • Educational Marginalization
    • Economic Boycott and Employment Bias
    • Role of Congress Propaganda and Banned Literature
  5. Reaction of All-India Muslim League
  6. Resignation of Congress Ministries (October 1939)
    • Cause of Resignation: Outbreak of WWII
    • Muslim League’s Response
  7. Celebration of Day of Deliverance (December 22, 1939)
    • Objectives and Political Message
    • Public Gatherings and Media
    • Support by Other Minorities
  8. Impact of the Congress Rule and Resignation
    • Strengthening of the Muslim League
    • Paving the Way for Pakistan Resolution (1940)
  9. Critical Analysis
  10. Conclusion
  1. Introduction

The rule of the Congress ministries from July 1937 to October 1939 was a turning point in Hindu-Muslim relations in British India. For the first time, the Indian National Congress held provincial power in seven provinces, and Muslims got a chance to assess Congress leadership in action. However, what unfolded was a period marked by deep Muslim alienation, religious oppression, and political marginalization, leading to a sharp shift toward Muslim separatism. The period culminated in the celebration of “Day of Deliverance” on December 22, 1939, following the Congress ministries’ resignation—a symbolic assertion of Muslim emancipation from Hindu majoritarianism.

  1. Formation of Congress Ministries (1937–1939)
  • The 1935 Government of India Act granted provincial autonomy, and elections were held in 1937.
  • Congress won majority in 7 out of 11 provinces, forming ministries in:
    • United Provinces (UP)
    • Bihar
    • Central Provinces
    • Orissa
    • Bombay
    • Madras
    • NWFP (briefly by Congress ally)
  • Despite Muslim League’s request for coalition governments, Congress refused power-sharing, rejecting Muslim League as representative of Indian Muslims.

“It was during Congress rule that Muslims realized their cultural, economic, and political existence was in peril.” – Dr. Ishtiaq Hussain Qureshi

  1. Overview of Muslim Expectations vs. Reality
  • Muslims initially hoped for inclusive governance under Congress rule.
  • They expected Congress to uphold secular promises, but the ministries revealed a strong undercurrent of Hindu cultural dominance.
  • The Muslim League, until then a weak organization, gained mass support in reaction to these policies.
  1. Sufferings of Muslims under Congress Rule
  2. a) Administrative Discrimination
  • Congress removed or demoted Muslim officials, favoring Hindu bureaucrats and Congress loyalists.
  • Police and administrative services witnessed Hindu dominance, particularly in UP and Bihar.
  1. b) Cultural and Religious Suppression
  • Introduction of Bande Mataram as a national song, which was seen by Muslims as idolatrous.
  • Promotion of Wardha Scheme of Education, which emphasized Hindu mythology and Gandhian ideals, excluding Islamic history and culture.
  • Celebration of Ganesh Puja, Shivaji Jayanti, and Tilak Day in official institutions.
  • Ban on Azan (call to prayer) through loudspeakers in some areas.
  • Cow protection movements were supported by Congress governments, leading to clashes with Muslims.
  1. c) Educational Marginalization
  • Imposition of Hindi in Devanagari script, sidelining Urdu, especially in United Provinces.
  • The Wardha Scheme made religious-neutral education inaccessible to Muslims.
  • Madrasas and Islamic schools were ignored or denied aid.
  1. d) Economic Boycott and Employment Bias
  • Bania-led economic policies harmed Muslim artisans and small traders.
  • Muslims were discriminated against in jobs, contracts, and promotions.
  • Congress-aligned businesses launched boycotts of Muslim shops in places like Bombay and UP.
  1. e) Propaganda and Censorship
  • Muslim newspapers were censored or banned.
  • Anti-Muslim propaganda through Congress-affiliated publications gained traction.
  • Literary works critical of Hindu nationalism were restricted.
  1. Reaction of All-India Muslim League
  • Under Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah’s leadership, the League mobilized a strong response.
  • Congress rule was termed “Hindu Raj” by Jinnah.
  • The Muslim League’s Lucknow session (1937) passed strong resolutions condemning Congress high-handedness.
  • The experiences validated Jinnah’s claim that Muslims were a separate nation, not a minority.

“We are not a minority. We are a nation.” — Muhammad Ali Jinnah, Lucknow Session, 1937

  1. Resignation of Congress Ministries (October 1939)
  • On September 3, 1939, Britain declared war on Germany, dragging India into WWII without Indian consultation.
  • Congress ministries resigned in protest against British unilateral decision.
  • This resignation provided an opportunity for the Muslim League to expose Congress failures.
  1. Celebration of Day of Deliverance (December 22, 1939)
  2. a) Objectives and Political Message
  • Announced by Quaid-e-Azam to mark freedom from Congress tyranny.
  • Aimed to:
    • Protest Congress oppression
    • Expose Hindu communalism
    • Unite Muslims behind Muslim League
  1. b) Public Gatherings and Media
  • Organized across Muslim-majority areas: UP, Bengal, Punjab, and Sindh.
  • Prayers, speeches, public processions, and black flag hoisting.
  • Urdu and English newspapers reported massive Muslim participation.
  1. c) Support from Other Minorities
  • Scheduled Castes (Dalits) under Dr. B.R. Ambedkar supported the Day of Deliverance.
  • Some Christian and Sikh groups also expressed concerns over Congress Hinduization.
  1. Impact of the Congress Rule and Resignation
  2. a) Strengthening of Muslim League
  • Shifted from elite group to mass political party.
  • Became the sole spokesperson for Muslims, especially after 1937–39 experiences.
  • Gained traction in rural Bengal, Punjab, and urban UP.
  1. b) Paving the Way for the Pakistan Resolution
  • The Day of Deliverance cemented Muslim identity politics.
  • Enabled the League to confidently present the Pakistan Resolution (March 23, 1940) in Lahore.
  1. Critical Analysis

Positive for Muslims

Negative Realities

Exposed Congress bias

Deepened Hindu-Muslim polarization

Galvanized Muslim League

Missed chance at inter-communal cooperation

Promoted political awareness

Solidified Two-Nation Theory

Showed Congress’s true face

Alienated even secular-minded Muslims

Though some critics argue that the Muslim League may have exaggerated Congress atrocities for political gain, primary sources and official records confirm widespread discrimination, justifying Muslim grievances.

  1. Conclusion

The period of Congress ministries’ rule from 1937 to 1939 was a defining moment in the political consciousness of Indian Muslims. The policies and practices of Congress-led provincial governments reinforced Muslim fears of cultural annihilation, economic marginalization, and political domination. The Day of Deliverance was not just a symbolic protest—it marked the transformation of the Muslim League into a mass movement, setting the stage for the Pakistan Movement. This era convinced Muslims that their socio-political future could not be secured under a Hindu-majority Congress, leading ultimately to the demand for a separate homeland.

Q. No. 5: Examine the Provisions of the Nehru Report That Affected Muslims. What Was the Muslim Response to These Provisions?

Outline

  1. Introduction
  2. Background of the Nehru Report (1928)
  3. Key Provisions of the Nehru Report
  4. Provisions That Affected Muslims
    • Rejection of Separate Electorates
    • Language and Cultural Concerns
    • Proposed Form of Government
    • Lack of Constitutional Safeguards for Minorities
    • Unitization vs. Federalism
  5. Muslim Response to the Nehru Report
    • All Parties Muslim Conference (Delhi, 1928)
    • Allama Iqbal and Quaid-i-Azam’s Criticism
    • Jinnah’s Fourteen Points (1929)
  6. Impact on Hindu-Muslim Relations
  7. Critical Evaluation
  8. Conclusion
  1. Introduction

The Nehru Report (1928) was a critical turning point in the history of Hindu-Muslim relations in British India. Framed as a draft constitution for India, it was seen by the Indian National Congress as a progressive document demanding dominion status from the British. However, for the Muslims, the Nehru Report signaled betrayal of earlier promises regarding minority rights and safeguards. It intensified communal polarization, galvanized Muslim political consciousness, and set the stage for the formal enunciation of the Two-Nation Theory through Jinnah’s Fourteen Points.

  1. Background of the Nehru Report (1928)
  • The British Government’s Simon Commission (1927) was boycotted by all Indian political parties because it had no Indian members.
  • As an alternative, an All Parties Conference was held, which appointed a committee under Pandit Motilal Nehru to prepare a constitutional draft for India.
  • The committee presented its report in August 1928, commonly known as the Nehru Report.
  • It was the first Indian attempt to frame a constitutional structure, but it reflected a Congress-dominated vision, ignoring minority concerns.
  1. Key Provisions of the Nehru Report
  • India to be a secular, democratic state with Dominion Status.
  • Establishment of a parliamentary system of government.
  • Fundamental rights guaranteed to all citizens, regardless of religion.
  • Joint electorates with reservation of seats for minorities only where necessary.
  • No state religion; complete separation of church and state.
  • Hindustani (in Roman script) to be the national language.
  1. Provisions That Affected Muslims
  2. a) Rejection of Separate Electorates
  • The report categorically opposed separate electorates for Muslims.
  • Joint electorates were proposed with reservation of seats only where necessary—a severe rollback from earlier agreements like the Lucknow Pact (1916).
  • Muslims feared that joint electorates would dilute their representation in Hindu-majority provinces.

“To Muslims, joint electorates meant political suffocation in a Hindu-majority democracy.” – Dr. Ishtiaq Hussain Qureshi

  1. b) Language and Cultural Concerns
  • Proposed Hindustani in Roman script as the national language.
  • Muslims, who favored Urdu in Persian script, viewed this as cultural hegemony.
  • The emphasis on Hindi idiom and Hindu culture made Muslims feel excluded.
  1. c) Proposed Form of Government
  • Advocated a unitary system, rather than federalism.
  • Muslims preferred a federal structure with provincial autonomy, especially in Muslim-majority areas like Punjab, Bengal, and NWFP.
  • A centralized unitary government threatened Muslim-majority provinces with domination by Hindu-majority center.
  1. d) Lack of Constitutional Safeguards for Minorities
  • Vague references to minority rights.
  • No concrete guarantees for:
    • Muslim religious freedom
    • Muslim educational and cultural institutions
    • Language rights, economic safeguards, or job quotas
  1. e) No Recognition of Muslims as a Separate Nation
  • The report treated Muslims as a religious minority, not as a distinct nation with political rights.
  • It ignored the communal reality and aspirations for Muslim identity and autonomy.
  1. Muslim Response to the Nehru Report
  2. a) All Parties Muslim Conference (Delhi, Dec 1928)
  • Convened under Aga Khan to reject the Nehru Report.
  • Demanded retention of separate electorates and provincial autonomy.
  • Marked the unified Muslim opposition to the Congress-dominated vision.
  1. b) Allama Iqbal’s Criticism
  • Rejected the Nehru Report for denying cultural autonomy.
  • In his Allahabad Address (1930), he demanded Muslim-majority provinces be granted autonomy, laying foundations of Pakistan.
  1. c) Jinnah’s Leadership and Fourteen Points (March 1929)
  • The Muslim League formally rejected the Nehru Report at its Delhi session.
  • Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah, disappointed with Hindu intransigence, formulated the Fourteen Points as the Muslim constitutional demands.

Key Points in Jinnah’s Fourteen Points:

  1. Federal system with provincial autonomy
  2. Protection of Muslim religion, culture, and education
  3. Separate electorates
  4. Protection of minorities
  5. Muslim rights to worship, dress, and education
  6. Urdu language rights
  7. Full religious freedom
  8. Muslims to be given due share in services and government

These points became the bedrock of Muslim political demands until the Pakistan Resolution of 1940.

  1. Impact on Hindu-Muslim Relations
  • The Nehru Report shattered the Lucknow Pact spirit of Hindu-Muslim cooperation.
  • Congress’s majoritarian attitude exposed its unwillingness to share power with Muslims.
  • The Muslim League moved from seeking safeguards within a united India to exploring the possibility of separation.
  • It was a watershed moment that deepened the communal divide.
  1. Critical Evaluation

Aspect

Critique

Democratic Vision

Though it advocated civil rights, it ignored communal realities.

Secularism

More Hindu-secular than neutral; Hindi over Urdu, unitary over federalism.

Joint Electorates

Appeared democratic but ignored Muslim fears of marginalization.

Minority Rights

Lacked enforceable guarantees; Muslims saw it as tokenism.

“The Nehru Report exposed the hollowness of Congress’s secularism.” — Khalid Bin Sayeed

While the report was a symbol of Indian nationalism, it became for Muslims a symbol of political betrayal and cultural denial.

  1. Conclusion

The Nehru Report of 1928, instead of uniting Indian communities under a common constitutional vision, drove a wedge between Hindus and Muslims. By rejecting separate electorates, ignoring Muslim cultural concerns, and proposing a unitary state, the report alienated Muslims, who feared Hindu domination. The Muslim League’s response, especially Jinnah’s Fourteen Points, marked the beginning of assertive Muslim nationalism. The failure of this document to accommodate Muslim aspirations played a decisive role in the ideological and political journey toward Pakistan.

Q. No. 6: “East Pakistan was the Test of Pakistani Leadership.” Discuss.

Outline

  1. Introduction
  2. Historical Context: Pakistan’s Creation and the East-West Divide
  3. Key Issues Testing Pakistani Leadership
    • Political Representation and the Language Controversy
    • Economic Disparity and Neglect
    • Administrative and Military Imbalance
    • Constitutional Delays and Centralization
  4. Political Crisis and Failure of National Integration
    • One Unit Scheme and its Impact
    • 1954 Dismissal of United Front Government
    • 1970 Elections and Yahya Khan’s Miscalculations
  5. Role of Civil-Military Bureaucracy
  6. Rise of Bengali Nationalism
  7. Indian Intervention and the Fall of Dhaka
  8. Critical Evaluation of Leadership Failure
    • Missed Opportunities
    • Arrogance and Mismanagement
    • Ethnic Insensitivity and Authoritarianism
  9. Lessons Learned
  10. Conclusion
  1. Introduction

The dismemberment of Pakistan in December 1971 with the secession of East Pakistan and emergence of Bangladesh stands as one of the most tragic and defining moments in South Asian history. The statement “East Pakistan was the test of Pakistani leadership” encapsulates the failure of successive civil and military elites to forge a unified national identity and ensure just governance and political inclusion. It was not merely a geographical or ethnic separation—it was the result of consistent political miscalculations, economic exploitation, and denial of democratic rights to the Bengali majority.

  1. Historical Context: Pakistan’s Creation and the East-West Divide
  • At its birth in 1947, Pakistan was divided into two geographically separated wings: West Pakistan (modern-day Pakistan) and East Pakistan (now Bangladesh), separated by over 1000 miles of Indian territory.
  • East Pakistan was home to 56% of the country’s population, yet it was economically underdeveloped, politically marginalized, and culturally distinct from the Urdu-speaking ruling elite of the West.
  • These divisions demanded wise leadership and inclusive governance, but instead, they exposed the structural weaknesses of Pakistani statecraft.
  1. Key Issues Testing Pakistani Leadership
  2. a) Political Representation and the Language Controversy
  • In 1948, Jinnah’s declaration that Urdu would be the sole national language sparked outrage in East Pakistan, where Bengali was the mother tongue of the majority.
  • The Bengali Language Movement (1952), resulting in deaths of students, became a symbol of cultural denial.
  • Despite being the numerical majority, Bengalis were underrepresented in political decision-making and the civil-military bureaucracy.

“The imposition of Urdu over Bengali was the first fracture in the unity of Pakistan.” – Dr. Safdar Mahmood

  1. b) Economic Disparity and Neglect
  • Despite contributing a major share to foreign exchange earnings, especially through jute exports, East Pakistan received less than 25% of national development expenditure.
  • Development projects, industrialization, and foreign aid were focused on West Pakistan.
  • The per capita income in East Pakistan remained significantly lower, fueling resentment.
  1. c) Administrative and Military Imbalance
  • Key posts in bureaucracy, military, and foreign service were dominated by West Pakistanis, especially Punjabis.
  • East Pakistanis constituted only 10–15% of the officer corps in the military.
  • There was no East Pakistani chief of army or civil bureaucracy from 1947 to 1971.
  1. d) Constitutional Delays and Centralization
  • The first constitution was delayed until 1956, fueling political uncertainty.
  • The One Unit Scheme (1955) equated all of West Pakistan with East Pakistan to dilute Bengali majority.
  • This artificial parity violated the principle of democratic representation.
  1. Political Crisis and Failure of National Integration
  2. a) One Unit Scheme and Its Impact
  • Meant to simplify administration, the One Unit scheme was actually a move to suppress East Pakistan’s majority.
  • It alienated smaller provinces and further isolated Bengalis, who saw it as a scheme to consolidate power in Punjab.
  1. b) Dismissal of the United Front Government (1954)
  • In 1954, the United Front, led by Fazlul Haq and Suhrawardy, won 223 out of 237 seats in East Bengal’s provincial assembly.
  • The central government dismissed the elected government, citing national security—a blatant disregard for democracy.
  1. c) 1970 Elections and Yahya Khan’s Miscalculations
  • Under General Yahya Khan, Pakistan held its first general elections in 1970.
  • Awami League, led by Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, won 160 of 162 East Pakistani seats, gaining a clear majority (56%) in the National Assembly.
  • The West Pakistani leadership refused to transfer power, fearing loss of control.
  • Jinnah’s ideal of democracy was abandoned in favor of military authoritarianism.
  1. Role of Civil-Military Bureaucracy
  • Both civilian and military rulers, from Ayub Khan to Yahya Khan, centralized power and failed to build inclusive institutions.
  • They dismissed popular Bengali leaders as “provincialists” and viewed East Pakistan as peripheral.
  • Decision-making was top-down, and inter-regional dialogues were discouraged.
  1. Rise of Bengali Nationalism
  • Sheikh Mujibur Rahman’s Six Points (1966) became the manifesto of East Pakistani autonomy, demanding:
    1. Federal constitution
    2. Separate currencies or fiscal policies
    3. Power of taxation and revenue to provinces
    4. Control of foreign trade by provinces
    5. Paramilitary forces for provinces
    6. East Pakistan’s right to earn foreign exchange
  • These demands were viewed as secessionist by the West, but they reflected genuine grievances.
  • The 1971 military operation (Operation Searchlight) led to mass killings, human rights abuses, and international condemnation.
  1. Indian Intervention and the Fall of Dhaka
  • In response to Pakistani military crackdown, millions of Bengali refugees fled to India.
  • India, under Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, supported the Mukti Bahini (Bengali guerillas).
  • On December 16, 1971, Pakistani forces surrendered in Dhaka, and Bangladesh was born.

“The fall of Dhaka was not caused by Indian aggression alone, but by the suicidal arrogance of Pakistani leadership.” – K.K. Aziz

  1. Critical Evaluation of Leadership Failure

Leadership Test

Response

Outcome

Language issue

Imposed Urdu

Violent protests and alienation

Economic disparity

Disregarded

Regional inequality and poverty

Political representation

Refused majority rule

Collapse of democracy

Cultural diversity

Imposed uniformity

Rise of Bengali nationalism

Military solution

Repression

Global isolation and defeat

  1. Lessons Learned
  • Federalism and regional autonomy are essential for a multiethnic state like Pakistan.
  • Authoritarianism and centralized policies sow seeds of disintegration.
  • Respect for electoral mandates and inclusive governance must prevail over military expediency.
  • Language and culture cannot be suppressed in the name of national unity.
  1. Conclusion

The case of East Pakistan serves as a historic test and indictment of Pakistani leadership. Rather than embracing the democratic principles and pluralism that could have united the country, the leadership chose the path of authoritarianism, cultural denial, and political exclusion. Their failure to accommodate the genuine aspirations of the Bengali people culminated in the most devastating national tragedy Pakistan has ever experienced. The lesson is clear: nationhood cannot be imposed; it must be nurtured through justice, inclusion, and mutual respect.

Q. No. 7: Akbar Failed to Establish “Nationalism” in the Subcontinent. Discuss.

Outline

  1. Introduction
  2. The Concept of Nationalism in Pre-modern Context
  3. Akbar’s Political Vision and Statecraft
  4. Efforts to Build a Supra-Religious National Identity
    • Sulh-i-Kul (Universal Tolerance)
    • Din-i-Ilahi
    • Rajput Alliance and Administrative Inclusion
    • Cultural Synthesis and Language Policy
    • Abolition of Jizya and Pilgrimage Tax
  5. Limitations of Akbar’s Integrationist Vision
    • Elite-Level Participation, Not Mass Integration
    • Religious Innovations vs. Orthodox Sentiment
    • Lack of Common National Consciousness
    • No Mass Communication Tools or Vernacular Unity
  6. Failure to Institutionalize a Nationalist Ethos
  7. Aftermath and Reversal Under Later Mughals
  8. Critical Evaluation
  9. Conclusion
  1. Introduction

The Mughal Emperor Jalal-ud-Din Muhammad Akbar (r. 1556–1605) is widely remembered for his progressive vision, religious tolerance, and administrative reforms. He tried to transcend ethnic, religious, and linguistic barriers in a bid to forge political unity across the Indian subcontinent. However, the idea that Akbar sought to establish “nationalism”, as understood today—a shared political identity rooted in common ethnicity, culture, and language—must be assessed in a pre-modern context. Despite his efforts to create imperial cohesion and loyalty, Akbar failed to establish nationalism because his vision lacked mass ideological penetration, institutional permanence, and cultural resonance beyond the elite.

  1. The Concept of Nationalism in Pre-modern Context
  • Nationalism, as a political ideology, emerged in Europe during the 18th–19th centuries with the French Revolution, emphasizing shared language, ethnicity, culture, and sovereignty.
  • In Akbar’s era, the subcontinent was a multi-ethnic, multi-linguistic, and multi-religious society, lacking modern concepts of nationhood.
  • Akbar’s attempts were closer to imperial integration and dynastic legitimacy, not modern nationalism.
  1. Akbar’s Political Vision and Statecraft
  • Akbar aimed to consolidate a fragmented empire through inclusion and loyalty, regardless of caste or creed.
  • His state was a centralized monarchy, not a participatory nation-state.
  • His policy of Sulh-i-Kul (peace with all) aimed at religious and political harmony, which some interpret as proto-nationalism.
  1. Efforts to Build a Supra-Religious National Identity
  2. a) Sulh-i-Kul (Universal Tolerance)
  • Akbar’s core policy promoted tolerance and mutual respect among all religious communities.
  • It curtailed discrimination, especially against non-Muslims, and created an inclusive civil ethos.

“The principle of Sulh-i-Kul was Akbar’s greatest moral tool to unify his empire.” – Abul Fazl, Ain-i-Akbari

  1. b) Din-i-Ilahi
  • Akbar tried to synthesize various religious beliefs into a spiritual doctrine that unified ethics over ritual.
  • Though not intended as a mass religion, it was elite-oriented and failed to take root.
  • It was seen by Muslim orthodoxy as heretical, causing alienation rather than integration.
  1. c) Rajput Alliance and Administrative Inclusion
  • Akbar married into Rajput families, integrated their nobles into the mansabdari system, and entrusted them with high administrative and military positions.
  • This promoted political loyalty, but not necessarily cultural or ideological unity.
  1. d) Cultural Synthesis and Language Policy
  • Patronized Persian as the language of administration while promoting local languages and arts.
  • Encouraged translation of Hindu scriptures (e.g., Mahabharata) into Persian.
  • However, linguistic unity or national language policy was non-existent.
  1. e) Abolition of Jizya and Pilgrimage Tax
  • These were discriminatory taxes on non-Muslims, abolished to promote equal civic status.
  • Though inclusive, these reforms lacked grassroots penetration.
  1. Limitations of Akbar’s Integrationist Vision
  2. a) Elite-Level Participation, Not Mass Integration
  • His policies favored noble elites, not common people.
  • The rural peasantry, artisans, and religious masses remained untouched by imperial ideology.
  1. b) Religious Innovations vs. Orthodox Sentiment
  • The ulema and orthodox Muslims viewed Akbar’s religious reforms as deviation from Islam.
  • This led to alienation of a powerful religious bloc, which resurged under later emperors.
  1. c) Lack of Common National Consciousness
  • No shared cultural identity emerged under Akbar.
  • The masses identified more with religion, region, and caste than with the Mughal empire.
  1. d) No Mass Communication Tools
  • Without printing press, public schooling, or nationalist propaganda, there was no mechanism to disseminate a national ideology.
  1. Failure to Institutionalize a Nationalist Ethos
  • Akbar’s ideology was personality-driven, not institutional.
  • After his death, Jahangir and Shah Jahan maintained court grandeur, but not ideological continuity.
  • Aurangzeb reversed many inclusive policies, reimposed jizya, and alienated Hindus, causing sectarian polarization.
  • This indicates that Akbar’s integrationist policies lacked institutional permanence.
  1. Aftermath and Reversal Under Later Mughals
  • Akbar’s successor Jahangir retained Sulh-i-Kul but lacked the same vision.
  • Aurangzeb (1658–1707) reversed inclusive policies and pursued a strict Sunni orthodox policy:
    • Reimposed jizya tax
    • Demolished several non-Muslim places of worship
    • Ended patronage of Hindu and Jain scholars
  • These actions led to:
    • Rise of Maratha and Sikh resistance
    • Alienation of Rajputs and Deccan rulers
    • Accelerated decline of Mughal authority

This demonstrates that Akbar’s project failed to evolve into a lasting national integration framework.

  1. Critical Evaluation

Efforts by Akbar

Intended Outcome

Limitations

Sulh-i-Kul

Religious harmony

Lacked popular acceptance

Din-i-Ilahi

Moral and spiritual unity

Elitist and failed

Rajput alliance

Political stability

Not extended to all communities

Language promotion

Cultural synthesis

Persian remained elitist

Abolition of taxes

Civic equality

Symbolic, not systemic

  • Akbar succeeded in imperial consolidation, not national integration.
  • His failure was structural, ideological, and communicative—not merely personal.

“Akbar built a great empire, but not a nation.” — Dr. Ishwari Prasad

  1. Conclusion

Akbar’s reign marks a remarkable chapter in the history of imperial pluralism, but it did not culminate in nationalism in the modern sense. His policies were visionary but elitist, inclusive but reversible, and spiritually creative but politically fragile. The absence of mass political consciousness, cultural unity, and institutional continuity rendered his project unsustainable. While Akbar passed the test of being a tolerant emperor, he failed to create a lasting nationalist ethos in the diverse subcontinent—a failure that echoes in later Mughal decline and the communal divisions of the modern era.

Q. No. 8: Examine Indo-Pak Relations in the Wake of the Kashmir Issue. Give Your Recommendations to Resolve This Issue.

Outline

  1. Introduction
  2. Historical Background of the Kashmir Dispute
  3. Key Phases of Indo-Pak Relations over Kashmir
    • 1947–48 War and the First UN Resolution
    • 1965 War and Tashkent Declaration
    • 1971 War and Simla Agreement
    • 1989 Insurgency and Indian Crackdown
    • 1999 Kargil War
    • 2001–2008 Peace Process and Composite Dialogue
    • Post-2016 Escalations (Uri, Pulwama, Balakot)
    • 2019 Revocation of Article 370
  4. Major Irritants in the Kashmir Conflict
  5. Impact of Kashmir Dispute on Indo-Pak Relations
    • Political Tensions
    • Militarization and Nuclear Deterrence
    • Diplomatic Isolation and Propaganda
    • Human Rights Crisis in Kashmir
  6. Role of International Organizations and Stakeholders
  7. Recommendations for Resolving the Kashmir Issue
  8. Critical Evaluation
  9. Conclusion
  1. Introduction

The Kashmir dispute is the core issue that has shaped and strained Indo-Pak relations since the partition of British India in 1947. Both nations claim the region of Jammu and Kashmir in full, but control only parts of it. The dispute has triggered wars, diplomatic breakdowns, and militarized borders, while also fueling internal insurgencies and regional insecurity. Despite numerous international mediation efforts and bilateral talks, the issue remains unresolved. A sustainable solution is imperative not only for South Asian peace and development but for global security, given both countries are nuclear-armed.

  1. Historical Background of the Kashmir Dispute
  • At the time of partition in 1947, princely states were given the choice to accede to India or Pakistan.
  • Maharaja Hari Singh, the Hindu ruler of Muslim-majority Kashmir, initially chose independence.
  • Following a tribal invasion from Pakistan, the Maharaja acceded to India under duress, prompting India to send troops.
  • Pakistan disputed the accession, claiming the region naturally belonged to it due to its Muslim majority.
  • The issue was taken to the United Nations, which passed Resolution 47 (1948) recommending:
    • Ceasefire
    • Withdrawal of Pakistani troops
    • Plebiscite under UN supervision
  • However, the plebiscite never materialized, and the region remains divided into:
    • Indian-administered Jammu & Kashmir (J&K)
    • Pakistan-administered Azad Jammu & Kashmir (AJK) and Gilgit-Baltistan
  1. Key Phases of Indo-Pak Relations over Kashmir
  2. a) 1947–48 War and UN Mediation
  • First Indo-Pak war ends with UN-mediated ceasefire (1949).
  • Line of Control (LoC) established, but plebiscite issue remains unresolved.
  1. b) 1965 War and Tashkent Declaration
  • Pakistan initiates Operation Gibraltar to infiltrate J&K.
  • War ends in stalemate; Tashkent Agreement (1966) brokered by USSR.
  • Both sides agree to non-interference and peaceful resolution, but distrust deepens.
  1. c) 1971 War and Simla Agreement
  • War over East Pakistan changes dynamics.
  • Simla Agreement (1972): Bilateral framework replaces UN mediation.
  • LoC formally accepted, but Kashmir issue remains frozen.
  1. d) 1989 Insurgency and Indian Crackdown
  • Armed insurgency erupts in Indian-administered Kashmir.
  • India blames Pakistan for cross-border terrorism.
  • Human rights violations, mass arrests, and military presence increase.
  1. e) 1999 Kargil War
  • Pakistan army infiltrates Indian positions in Kargil sector.
  • War escalates but India repels the intrusions; international backlash against Pakistan.
  1. f) 2001–2008 Composite Dialogue Process
  • Post-Kargil thaw leads to confidence-building measures (CBMs):
    • Bus and train services
    • Cultural exchanges
    • Ceasefire on LoC
  • Some progress on demilitarization and trade in Kashmir.
  1. g) Post-2016 Escalations
  • Uri attack (2016) and Pulwama suicide bombing (2019) worsen ties.
  • India conducts surgical strikes and Balakot airstrikes in Pakistan.
  • Diplomatic relations nearly collapse.
  1. h) 2019 Revocation of Article 370
  • India revokes J&K’s special constitutional status (Article 370 & 35A).
  • Converts state into two Union Territories.
  • Pakistan reacts with strong condemnation, downgrading diplomatic ties and suspending trade.
  • UN and global organizations express concern over human rights and unilateralism.
  1. Major Irritants in the Kashmir Conflict

Issue

Impact

Legal Dispute

India sees Kashmir as integral; Pakistan views it as unfinished partition agenda

Religious-Ethnic Divide

Muslim-majority region in Hindu-majority India creates identity clash

Human Rights Abuses

Allegations of torture, disappearances, media bans in Indian Kashmir

Cross-Border Terrorism

India blames Pakistan-based groups like JeM, LeT

Militarization

Highest militarized zone; nuclear flashpoint

Lack of Dialogue Mechanism

No sustained diplomatic channel post-2019

  1. Impact of Kashmir Dispute on Indo-Pak Relations
  2. a) Political Tensions
  • Kashmir has prevented normalization of bilateral relations.
  • Every crisis leads to blame game, often affecting global forums like SAARC.
  1. b) Militarization and Nuclear Deterrence
  • Both nations spend heavily on defense, diverting funds from social development.
  • Nuclear doctrines (India’s No First Use vs. Pakistan’s First Use policy) heighten risk of escalation.
  1. c) Diplomatic Isolation and Propaganda
  • Pakistan attempts to internationalize the issue, while India seeks to bilateralize it.
  • Media from both sides propagates nationalist narratives, deepening public hostility.
  1. d) Human Rights Crisis in Kashmir
  • Lockdowns, pellet gun usage, communication blackouts, and civilian casualties have drawn UN criticism.
  • Both sides accuse each other of violations and cross-border abuses.
  1. Role of International Organizations and Stakeholders
  • United Nations: Passed multiple resolutions but lacks enforcement due to India’s opposition.
  • USA, China, OIC, EU: Urge restraint but avoid direct mediation.
  • China’s involvement in Aksai Chin and CPEC through Gilgit-Baltistan complicates the dispute.
  • OIC consistently supports Pakistan’s stance, but lacks geopolitical leverage.
  1. Recommendations for Resolving the Kashmir Issue
  2. a) Revival of Bilateral Dialogue
  • Resume Composite Dialogue Process with a dedicated Kashmir track.
  • Utilize Track-II diplomacy to foster understanding at civil society level.
  1. b) Reinstate Confidence-Building Measures (CBMs)
  • Reopen cross-LoC trade and transport.
  • Allow visa liberalization, media exchanges, and academic forums.
  1. c) Demilitarization of Kashmir
  • Gradual reduction in troop deployment under international monitoring.
  • Create demilitarized zones around the LoC.
  1. d) International Mediation or Arbitration
  • Appoint neutral third-party observer (e.g., Norway, Turkey, or UN Envoy) to facilitate structured negotiations.
  1. e) Protect Human Rights and Civil Liberties
  • End arbitrary detentions and communication bans.
  • Allow international human rights observers to assess ground realities.
  1. f) Involve Kashmiri Stakeholders
  • Any resolution must include legitimate representation from both sides of Kashmir.
  • Avoid imposing top-down solutions without public consent.
  1. g) Promote Regional Economic Integration
  • Use SAARC and South Asian economic cooperation as a platform to reduce hostility and promote interdependence.
  1. Critical Evaluation

Aspect

India’s Perspective

Pakistan’s Perspective

Issue

Legal Status

Integral part of India

Disputed territory per UN

Opposing frameworks

Militancy

Cross-border terrorism

Freedom struggle

Mutual blame

Mediation

Bilateral solution only

Seeks international help

No common mechanism

Human Rights

Denies abuses

Highlights violations

Credibility gaps

  • Both states need to reimagine Kashmir not as a territory but as a humanitarian issue.
  • Historical rigidity and zero-sum nationalism have fueled a cycle of conflict.
  • Any lasting resolution requires visionary leadership, public consensus, and institutional continuity.
  1. Conclusion

The Kashmir issue has cast a long shadow over Indo-Pak relations, shaping decades of hostility, war, and missed opportunities for peace. It has transformed from a territorial dispute into a political, humanitarian, and regional security crisis. While history cannot be rewritten, the future can still be reimagined. A solution based on justice, dialogue, human dignity, and mutual respect is not just necessary for Kashmiris—but for the very stability and prosperity of South Asia. The time to act is now, before the next crisis threatens regional and global peace.

 

.  . Indo Pak History 2021 Indo Pak History 2021 Indo Pak History 2021 Indo Pak History 2021 Indo Pak History 2021 Indo Pak History 2021 Indo Pak History 2021 Indo Pak History 2021 Indo Pak History 2021 Indo Pak History 2021 Indo Pak History 2021 Indo Pak History 2021 Indo Pak History 2021 Indo Pak History 2021 Indo Pak History 2021 Indo Pak History 2021 Indo Pak History 2021 Indo Pak History 2021 Indo Pak History 2021 Indo Pak History 2021 Indo Pak History 2021 

You cannot copy content of this pages.