Css 2019

Log In

Q. No. 2. Discuss the way in which globalization could promote regionalization as an adaptation.

Outline

  1. Introduction
  2. Understanding Globalization and Regionalization
  3. The Relationship between Globalization and Regionalization
  4. How Globalization Promotes Regionalization
    • Economic Integration and Trade Blocs
    • Political Alliances and Regional Governance
    • Cultural Preservation and Regional Identity
    • Regional Security and Strategic Collaboration
    • Infrastructure and Connectivity Projects
  5. Case Studies
    • European Union (EU)
    • ASEAN
    • African Union (AU)
    • South Asian Regionalism (SAARC)
  6. Challenges and Criticisms
  7. Conclusion
  1. Introduction

Globalization, often associated with increased interdependence, mobility, and global markets, paradoxically also triggers the strengthening of regional identities and cooperation. As states face common global pressures—economic competition, climate change, pandemics—they respond by building regional alliances. This process, known as regionalization, represents a strategic adaptation to safeguard national and regional interests within a rapidly changing global system.

  1. Understanding Globalization and Regionalization

Term

Definition

Globalization

The process of increasing cross-border flows of goods, capital, people, ideas.

Regionalization

The intensification of cooperation and integration within a specific region.

“Regionalization is not the antithesis of globalization, but a reorganization of global interactions along geographic lines.” — Anthony McGrew

  1. The Relationship between Globalization and Regionalization

Globalization creates a borderless economy but also exposes states to volatility, foreign influence, and competitive disadvantages. In response, regionalization provides a buffer—a way for countries to adapt to global pressures while preserving autonomy, securing trade benefits, and enhancing collective bargaining.

  1. How Globalization Promotes Regionalization
  2. Economic Integration and Trade Blocs
  • Global trade competition encourages regional trade alliances like:
    • European Union (EU)
    • ASEAN
    • African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA)
  • Shared tariff structures, labor mobility, and investment rules give regions leverage in global markets.
  1. Political Alliances and Regional Governance
  • Global political instability (e.g., US-China rivalry) drives countries to seek stability through regional forums.
  • Regional governance bodies help standardize policies, resolve disputes, and negotiate collectively in the global arena (e.g., EU Parliament, ECOWAS).
  1. Cultural Preservation and Regional Identity
  • Global culture can erode local languages, values, and traditions.
  • Regionalization fosters a collective cultural identity (e.g., Latin American literature networks, African Union’s cultural revival policies).
  • Broadcasting unions and language partnerships help resist homogenization.
  1. Regional Security and Strategic Collaboration
  • Global terrorism and conflicts push regions to form security blocs.
  • Examples:
    • SCO addresses terrorism in Central Asia.
    • EU’s Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) coordinates military strategy.
  1. Infrastructure and Connectivity Projects
  • Globalization fuels mega-regional infrastructure projects like:
    • Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)
    • North-South Transport Corridor (NSTC)
    • Trans-African Highway
  • These enhance intra-regional connectivity while aligning with global supply chains.
  1. Case Studies
  2. European Union (EU)
  • Response to two World Wars and economic competition.
  • A unified currency, customs union, labor mobility, and parliamentary governance make EU a global actor.
  • Uses regionalism to compete with US and China.
  1. ASEAN
  • Established to maintain peace in Southeast Asia.
  • Shared development goals, conflict resolution platforms, and trade liberalization.
  • Shields members from US-China trade tensions.
  1. African Union (AU)
  • Reacts to neocolonialism and underdevelopment.
  • Promotes regional industrialization, peacekeeping, and economic autonomy.
  1. South Asia (SAARC)
  • Globalization revealed regional inefficiencies.
  • While less successful than EU or ASEAN, it has potential through:
    • Energy cooperation
    • Counter-terrorism
    • Trade corridors (e.g., CPEC)
  1. Challenges and Criticisms

Issue

Implication

Unequal Development

Stronger states dominate regional blocs (e.g., India in SAARC).

Bureaucratic Delays

Regional treaties often stall due to lack of consensus.

Political Tensions

Regional disputes (e.g., India-Pakistan) hamper cooperation.

External Dependence

Many regional projects are externally funded, risking debt traps.

  1. Conclusion

Globalization, far from eliminating regional distinctions, has in fact intensified the need for regional cooperation. As states confront common global threats, regionalization becomes an adaptive strategy—offering a middle path between isolation and overexposure. To be successful, however, regions must overcome internal political divides, build inclusive governance, and invest in collective resilience.

“Think globally, act regionally.” — A modern principle of diplomatic and economic survival.

Q. No. 4. Critically evaluate the role of Post-World War-II International Financial Regimes in the economic development of the less developed countries.

Outline

  1. Introduction
  2. Understanding Globalization and Regionalization
  3. The Relationship between Globalization and Regionalization
  4. How Globalization Promotes Regionalization
    • Economic Integration and Trade Blocs
    • Political Alliances and Regional Governance
    • Cultural Preservation and Regional Identity
    • Regional Security and Strategic Collaboration
    • Infrastructure and Connectivity Projects
  5. Case Studies
    • European Union (EU)
    • ASEAN
    • African Union (AU)
    • South Asian Regionalism (SAARC)
  6. Challenges and Criticisms
  7. Conclusion
  1. Introduction

Globalization, often associated with increased interdependence, mobility, and global markets, paradoxically also triggers the strengthening of regional identities and cooperation. As states face common global pressures—economic competition, climate change, pandemics—they respond by building regional alliances. This process, known as regionalization, represents a strategic adaptation to safeguard national and regional interests within a rapidly changing global system.

  1. Understanding Globalization and Regionalization

Term

Definition

Globalization

The process of increasing cross-border flows of goods, capital, people, ideas.

Regionalization

The intensification of cooperation and integration within a specific region.

“Regionalization is not the antithesis of globalization, but a reorganization of global interactions along geographic lines.” — Anthony McGrew

  1. The Relationship between Globalization and Regionalization

Globalization creates a borderless economy but also exposes states to volatility, foreign influence, and competitive disadvantages. In response, regionalization provides a buffer—a way for countries to adapt to global pressures while preserving autonomy, securing trade benefits, and enhancing collective bargaining.

  1. How Globalization Promotes Regionalization
  2. Economic Integration and Trade Blocs
  • Global trade competition encourages regional trade alliances like:
    • European Union (EU)
    • ASEAN
    • African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA)
  • Shared tariff structures, labor mobility, and investment rules give regions leverage in global markets.
  1. Political Alliances and Regional Governance
  • Global political instability (e.g., US-China rivalry) drives countries to seek stability through regional forums.
  • Regional governance bodies help standardize policies, resolve disputes, and negotiate collectively in the global arena (e.g., EU Parliament, ECOWAS).
  1. Cultural Preservation and Regional Identity
  • Global culture can erode local languages, values, and traditions.
  • Regionalization fosters a collective cultural identity (e.g., Latin American literature networks, African Union’s cultural revival policies).
  • Broadcasting unions and language partnerships help resist homogenization.
  1. Regional Security and Strategic Collaboration
  • Global terrorism and conflicts push regions to form security blocs.
  • Examples:
    • SCO addresses terrorism in Central Asia.
    • EU’s Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) coordinates military strategy.
  1. Infrastructure and Connectivity Projects
  • Globalization fuels mega-regional infrastructure projects like:
    • Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)
    • North-South Transport Corridor (NSTC)
    • Trans-African Highway
  • These enhance intra-regional connectivity while aligning with global supply chains.
  1. Case Studies
  2. European Union (EU)
  • Response to two World Wars and economic competition.
  • A unified currency, customs union, labor mobility, and parliamentary governance make EU a global actor.
  • Uses regionalism to compete with US and China.
  1. ASEAN
  • Established to maintain peace in Southeast Asia.
  • Shared development goals, conflict resolution platforms, and trade liberalization.
  • Shields members from US-China trade tensions.
  1. African Union (AU)
  • Reacts to neocolonialism and underdevelopment.
  • Promotes regional industrialization, peacekeeping, and economic autonomy.
  1. South Asia (SAARC)
  • Globalization revealed regional inefficiencies.
  • While less successful than EU or ASEAN, it has potential through:
    • Energy cooperation
    • Counter-terrorism
    • Trade corridors (e.g., CPEC)
  1. Challenges and Criticisms

Issue

Implication

Unequal Development

Stronger states dominate regional blocs (e.g., India in SAARC).

Bureaucratic Delays

Regional treaties often stall due to lack of consensus.

Political Tensions

Regional disputes (e.g., India-Pakistan) hamper cooperation.

External Dependence

Many regional projects are externally funded, risking debt traps.

  1. Conclusion

Globalization, far from eliminating regional distinctions, has in fact intensified the need for regional cooperation. As states confront common global threats, regionalization becomes an adaptive strategy—offering a middle path between isolation and overexposure. To be successful, however, regions must overcome internal political divides, build inclusive governance, and invest in collective resilience.

“Think globally, act regionally.” — A modern principle of diplomatic and economic survival.

Q. No. 5. Critically evaluate the role of Military in Turkish Politics?

Outline

  1. Introduction
  2. Historical Background of the Turkish Military
  3. Kemalist Ideology and the Military’s Political Role
  4. Military Interventions in Turkish Politics
    • 1960 Coup
    • 1971 Memorandum
    • 1980 Coup
    • 1997 “Postmodern Coup”
    • 2016 Failed Coup Attempt
  5. Constitutional and Institutional Mechanisms of Military Influence
  6. Civil-Military Relations: Shifting Dynamics
  7. AKP Era and the Decline of Military Influence
  8. Comparative Perspective: Military’s Role in Democratic and Authoritarian Shifts
  9. Conclusion
  1. Introduction

The Turkish military has long been a central force in the country’s political landscape, historically viewing itself as the guardian of secularism, national unity, and Kemalist values. While Turkey has transitioned toward a more civilian-dominated democracy since the early 2000s, the legacy of military influence continues to shape its politics.

  1. Historical Background of the Turkish Military
  • Originated from the Ottoman military and inherited by Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, the founder of modern Turkey.
  • Atatürk’s reforms embedded secularism, nationalism, and modernization, and the military became the protector of Kemalist ideology.
  • The 1961 and 1982 constitutions institutionalized the military’s role in governance through the National Security Council (MGK).
  1. Kemalist Ideology and the Military’s Political Role

Kemalist Principle

Military’s Role

Secularism

Suppressed Islamist movements (e.g., 1997 intervention)

Nationalism

Suppressed Kurdish demands for autonomy

Republicanism

Opposed perceived authoritarianism or anti-republicanism

The Turkish Armed Forces (TSK) claimed the duty to intervene when they perceived threats to these principles.

  1. Military Interventions in Turkish Politics
  2. 1960 Coup
  • Overthrew the Democratic Party government led by Adnan Menderes.
  • Resulted in executions and a new constitution (1961).
  1. 1971 Military Memorandum
  • Not a direct coup, but a threat to intervene.
  • Forced the resignation of the government amid political instability.
  1. 1980 Coup
  • Military took full control amid political chaos and violence.
  • Thousands arrested, political parties dissolved.
  • Drafted the 1982 Constitution, enhancing military’s powers.
  1. 1997 “Postmodern Coup”
  • Military used media and judiciary to force Islamist-led coalition to resign.
  • No direct intervention, but heavy institutional pressure.
  1. 2016 Failed Coup Attempt
  • A faction within the military attempted to overthrow Erdoğan’s government.
  • Defeated by public resistance and police.
  • Led to purges, mass arrests, and restructuring of the military.
  1. Constitutional and Institutional Mechanisms of Military Influence
  • National Security Council (MGK): Enabled military to influence civilian policymaking.
  • Military Courts: Autonomous judiciary until abolished post-2010.
  • Budgetary Autonomy: Military had privileged access to funds.
  • Education and Bureaucracy: Trained in military academies with ideological orientation.
  1. Civil-Military Relations: Shifting Dynamics

Period

Nature of Civil-Military Relations

1960–1997

Dominance of military over politics

2002–2016 (AKP Era)

Gradual civilian control, military pushed back via legal reforms

Post-2016 (Post-Coup)

Drastic weakening of military autonomy, centralization of power

The AKP (Justice and Development Party), led by Erdoğan, significantly curtailed military influence through:

  • Ergenekon and Balyoz trials
  • Reforms reducing MGK powers
  • Civilian oversight of defense budget
  1. AKP Era and the Decline of Military Influence
  • 2007 Presidential crisis: Military tried to block Abdullah Gül’s election.
  • Post-2010 reforms: Military removed from policy advisory roles.
  • Post-2016 restructuring:
    • Military education institutions brought under civilian control.
    • Gendarmerie and Coast Guard transferred to Interior Ministry.
    • General Staff subordinated to Ministry of Defense.

“The 2016 coup attempt ironically strengthened Erdoğan’s hand to civilianize the military.” — F. Keyman

  1. Comparative Perspective: Military’s Role in Democratic and Authoritarian Shifts

Positive Role

Negative Role

Preserved secularism in formative decades

Repeated coups disrupted democratic growth

Stabilized chaotic political environments

Delayed institutional political development

Countered perceived Islamist threats

Contributed to political repression and arrests

While the military sometimes acted in defense of democratic values, its frequent interventions eroded democratic institutions and civilian supremacy.

  1. Conclusion

The Turkish military has played a dual role in the country’s politics—both as a guardian of secularism and order, and as a disruptor of democratic evolution. However, recent decades, especially after 2016, have witnessed a substantial decline in military’s political influence and a corresponding rise in civilian centralization of power. This shift marks a new era in Turkish civil-military relations—one with its own challenges regarding authoritarianism, but also opportunities for true democratic consolidation if institutional balance is restored.

“The journey from praetorian dominance to civilian supremacy is not linear, but it is essential for democratic resilience.” — Samuel Huntington

Q. No. 6. Discuss the powers and functions of China’s National People’s Congress?

Outline

  1. Introduction
  2. Structure of the Chinese Political System
  3. The National People’s Congress (NPC): Overview
  4. Constitutional Status of the NPC
  5. Powers and Functions of the NPC
    • Legislative Powers
    • Electoral and Appointive Functions
    • Supervisory Functions
    • Budgetary Powers
    • Treaty Ratification
    • Amendment of Constitution
  6. Relationship with the Communist Party of China (CPC)
  7. Criticism and Limitations
  8. Comparative Perspective: NPC vs Other Parliaments
  9. Conclusion
  1. Introduction

The National People’s Congress (NPC) is the highest organ of state power in the People’s Republic of China (PRC). According to the Chinese Constitution, it is the sole national legislature and plays a central role in enacting laws, approving policies, and overseeing government institutions. Despite its wide powers on paper, its functioning is closely aligned with the directives of the Communist Party of China (CPC).

  1. Structure of the Chinese Political System

China follows a unitary, socialist, one-party system, where:

  • The CPC exercises de facto control.
  • The NPC is the highest state body, and other branches derive legitimacy from it.
  • Premier, President, and Judiciary are all accountable to the NPC.
  1. The National People’s Congress (NPC): Overview

Feature

Detail

Established

1954 (by the Constitution of PRC)

Sessions

Annually (usually in March)

Number of Deputies

~2,980 members (largest parliament in the world)

Term Duration

5 years

Headed by

Standing Committee of the NPC

Dominated by

Communist Party of China (CPC)

  1. Constitutional Status of the NPC

As per Articles 57–70 of the PRC Constitution (1982, amended):

“The NPC is the supreme organ of state power. It exercises legislative, supervisory, budgetary, and electoral powers.”

  1. Powers and Functions of the NPC
  2. Legislative Powers
  • Enacts basic laws governing criminal, civil, commercial, administrative, and procedural matters.
  • Reviews and passes laws drafted by the State Council or Standing Committee.
  • Can repeal or amend existing laws.
  1. Electoral and Appointive Functions
  • Elects and removes:
    • President and Vice President of China
    • Premier (nominated by the President)
    • Chief Justice of Supreme People’s Court
    • Chief Procurator of Supreme People’s Procuratorate
    • Chairman of the Central Military Commission (CMC)

This gives the NPC formal control over executive, judicial, and military leadership.

  1. Supervisory Functions
  • Monitors work of:
    • State Council (Cabinet)
    • Supreme People’s Court
    • Supreme Procuratorate
  • Standing Committee holds sessions throughout the year and plays a key oversight role.
  1. Budgetary Powers
  • Reviews and approves:
    • National economic and social development plans
    • State budgets and final accounts
  1. Treaty Ratification
  • Approves and ratifies international treaties and agreements signed by the State Council.
  1. Constitutional Amendment
  • Sole authority to amend the PRC Constitution (requires two-thirds majority).
  1. Relationship with the Communist Party of China (CPC)

Though the NPC is constitutionally powerful, real authority lies with the CPC.

Aspect

Reality

Elections

Controlled by CPC; limited multi-candidate choices

Decision-making

Based on Party Congress and Politburo guidelines

Rubber-stamp view

Often passes laws with unanimous or near-unanimous votes

NPC functions largely as a ratifying body for policies already vetted by the Party leadership.

  1. Criticism and Limitations
  • Lack of genuine opposition or policy debate.
  • NPC deputies mostly Party loyalists or representatives of affiliated groups.
  • Decentralized power centers (e.g., Politburo Standing Committee) overshadow the NPC.
  • Critics argue it serves as a legitimizing organ for Party decisions.
  1. Comparative Perspective

Institution

China (NPC)

USA (Congress)

UK (Parliament)

Election

Indirect; vetted by CPC

Direct public elections

Direct elections (Commons)

Debate

Minimal, Party-aligned

Open, with strong opposition

Open and adversarial

Amendment Power

Yes, needs 2/3rd majority

Yes (2/3rd majority)

Yes (simple majority)

Budget Approval

Yes, formal authority

Yes

Yes

Real Policy Control

Controlled by CPC

Independent legislature

Semi-sovereign (Executive dominance)

  1. Conclusion

The National People’s Congress is the highest constitutional organ of state power in China, vested with comprehensive powers across legislation, governance, and oversight. However, its operational framework is heavily influenced and guided by the Communist Party of China, which curtails its autonomy. While it ensures stability and efficiency in a one-party model, it lacks the pluralism, dissent, and independence found in liberal parliamentary systems. Any future transformation toward democratization would require strengthening the NPC’s independence and transparency.

“The NPC reflects the Chinese model of governance—efficient but centrally controlled.” — Prof. David Shambaugh

Q. No. 7. Make a comparative analysis of the Constitution of 1956 and amended Constitution of Pakistan 1973?

Outline

  1. Introduction
  2. Background and Historical Context
  3. Comparative Analysis
    • Form of Government
    • Nature of State
    • Legislature
    • Judiciary
    • Head of State and Government
    • Fundamental Rights and Islamic Provisions
    • Provincial Autonomy
    • Role of the Army
    • Amendment Procedure
  4. Post-Amendment (18th Amendment, 2010) Transformations in the 1973 Constitution
  5. Strengths and Limitations
  6. Conclusion
  1. Introduction

Pakistan has experienced multiple constitutional experiments. The 1956 Constitution was Pakistan’s first democratic attempt, while the 1973 Constitution, especially after the 18th Amendment, reflects a more evolved federal and parliamentary structure. A comparative analysis reveals the evolution of constitutionalism in Pakistan amid political instability, civil-military imbalances, and demands for provincial autonomy.

  1. Background and Historical Context

Constitution

Context

1956

Enacted after 9 years of deliberation post-independence. Pakistan declared an Islamic Republic.

1973

Passed under Zulfikar Ali Bhutto. Designed as a consensus document between provinces and parties.

  1. Comparative Analysis
  2. Form of Government

Feature

Constitution 1956

Constitution 1973 (Amended)

Type

Parliamentary, Islamic Republic

Parliamentary, Islamic Republic

Head of State

President

President (ceremonial)

Head of Government

Prime Minister

Prime Minister (executive powers)

Executive Powers

Shared by President & PM

Concentrated in PM (after 18th Amend.)

Note: The 1956 Constitution was suspended in 1958, preventing its maturity.

  1. Nature of State
  • Both constitutions declared Pakistan an Islamic state.
  • 1956 made it officially the “Islamic Republic”.
  • 1973 Constitution, especially post-Zia era, intensified Islamization.
  1. Legislature

Feature

1956 Constitution

1973 Constitution (post-18th Amendment)

Structure

Unicameral

Bicameral (Senate & National Assembly)

Membership

Equal for East & West Pakistan (300 total)

Senate ensures equal provincial representation

  1. Judiciary
  • 1956: Independence ensured, but vulnerable to military interventions.
  • 1973: Defined hierarchy of courts; post-18th Amendment, stronger emphasis on judicial independence.
  1. Fundamental Rights and Islamic Provisions

Rights/Provisions

1956 Constitution

1973 Constitution

Fundamental Rights

Recognized (e.g., equality, speech)

Recognized and expanded

Council of Islamic Ideology

Present (advisory role)

Strengthened role post-Zia amendments

Shariah Law

Objective Resolution made preamble

Objective Resolution made substantive part (Art. 2A)

  1. Provincial Autonomy

Feature

1956

1973 (Post-18th Amendment)

Provinces

Two wings: East & West Pakistan

Four provinces, strong federal basis

Autonomy

Limited; dominated by center

Significantly enhanced post-18th Amendment

The 18th Amendment (2010) marked a historic shift by abolishing the Concurrent List, devolving more power to provinces.

  1. Role of the Army
  • 1956: No clear check on military’s political role; led to 1958 martial law.
  • 1973: Constitutionally subordinated to civilian authority, but repeatedly violated in practice.
  1. Amendment Procedure

Constitution

Amendment Method

1956

Difficult, centralized

1973

Two-thirds majority in both houses; post-18th Amendment, strengthened protections for key articles

  1. Post-Amendment (18th Amendment) Transformations in the 1973 Constitution

The 18th Amendment (2010) significantly altered Pakistan’s constitutional framework:

  • Reinstated parliamentary supremacy by clipping presidential powers (Articles 58(2)(b), etc.).
  • Reaffirmed provincial autonomy and fiscal decentralization.
  • Restored the original vision of the 1973 consensus constitution.
  1. Strengths and Limitations

Aspect

1956 Constitution

1973 Constitution (Post-18th Amendment)

Strengths

First democratic effort; declared Islamic republic

Consensus-based, robust federal structure

Weaknesses

Ambiguous balance of power; unstable

Repeated suspensions; military overrides

  1. Conclusion

The 1956 Constitution was a symbolic milestone, but it failed to function due to political instability and military adventurism. The 1973 Constitution, by contrast, is more durable and evolved, especially post-18th Amendment. While it continues to face challenges—such as judicial overreach, civil-military imbalance, and administrative inefficiencies—it remains Pakistan’s most representative and resilient constitutional document to date.

“The Constitution of 1973 is not just a legal framework, but a reflection of Pakistan’s democratic aspirations.” — Dr. I. Hassan

Q. No. 8. In the Post World War-II period, what were the important patterns of the Balance of Power?

Outline

  1. Introduction
  2. Theoretical Concept: Balance of Power
  3. Key Phases of Balance of Power Post-WWII
    • Bipolarity (1945–1991)
    • Unipolarity (1991–2008)
    • Emerging Multipolarity (2008–Present)
  4. Patterns and Dynamics
    • US-Soviet Rivalry
    • Role of Alliances (NATO, Warsaw Pact)
    • Strategic Arms Race and Deterrence
    • Proxy Wars and Non-Aligned Movement
    • Collapse of USSR and Rise of US Hegemony
    • Rise of China and Regional Balancers
  5. Contemporary Balance of Power: Hybrid & Complex
  6. Case Study: South Asia’s Regional Balance
  7. Conclusion
  1. Introduction

The Balance of Power refers to a condition in international relations where no single state dominates, and power is distributed to prevent hegemony. After World War II, the global balance shifted dramatically, from multipolarity to bipolarity, and later to unipolarity and emerging multipolarity. These patterns shaped alliances, conflicts, and global governance systems.

  1. Theoretical Concept: Balance of Power
  • Originates in Realist theory of international relations.
  • States maintain equilibrium through:
    • Military build-up
    • Alliances
    • Strategic diplomacy

“The balance of power is the most essential concept of classical realism.” — Hans Morgenthau

  1. Key Phases of Post-WWII Balance of Power
  2. Bipolarity (1945–1991)
  • World divided between:
    • United States (capitalist bloc)
    • Soviet Union (communist bloc)

Power Bloc

US-led NATO

USSR-led Warsaw Pact

Ideology

Capitalism, democracy

Communism, one-party rule

Strategy

Containment of communism

Expansion of ideology

Tools

Marshall Plan, CIA

KGB, COMECON

  1. Unipolarity (1991–2008)
  • After USSR collapse (1991):
    • US emerges as sole superpower
    • NATO expands eastward
    • US-led wars in Iraq, Afghanistan show unilateralism

Termed “Unipolar Moment” by Charles Krauthammer

  1. Emerging Multipolarity (2008–Present)
  • Rise of China, revival of Russia, regional players like India, Brazil, and EU.
  • Decline of US absolute dominance.
  • Multiplex world with issue-based coalitions (e.g., BRICS, SCO, QUAD).
  1. Patterns and Dynamics of Power Balance
  2. US-Soviet Rivalry (Cold War Era)
  • Balance through Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD)
  • Cuban Missile Crisis (1962): Apex of nuclear brinkmanship
  1. Strategic Alliances
  • NATO (1949): Collective defense of West
  • Warsaw Pact (1955): Soviet bloc counterbalance
  1. Arms Race and Deterrence
  • Nuclear proliferation and space race
  • SALT I & II, START treaties to manage escalation
  1. Proxy Wars
  • Vietnam, Korea, Afghanistan (1979), Latin America
  • Balance of influence via indirect warfare
  1. Non-Aligned Movement (NAM)
  • Led by Nehru, Nasser, Tito
  • Attempt to neutralize bipolarity
  • Political weight, but limited military relevance
  1. Collapse of USSR (1991)
  • End of Cold War
  • Birth of a US-centric international order
  1. Contemporary Balance: Hybrid & Complex

Feature

Description

Multipolar Trends

US, China, EU, Russia, India—emerging power centers

Economic Balance

China’s economic rise counters Western financial dominance

Military Coalitions

NATO, QUAD, AUKUS vs SCO, CSTO

Cyber/Nuclear Power

Emerging areas of balance (AI, cybersecurity, 5th-gen war)

  1. Case Study: South Asia
  • India vs Pakistan: Strategic balance ensured via nuclear deterrence
  • Role of China: Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) redefines regional balance
  • Afghanistan and Indo-Pacific: Zones of emerging alignments
  1. Conclusion

The patterns of balance of power post-WWII reflect a transitional international order—from bipolar containment to unipolar domination, and now toward multipolar complexity. The increasing interdependence through globalization, economic integration, and emerging technologies has changed how states seek balance—not just through arms but through alliances, soft power, and strategic networks.

“Power in the 21st century is less about control of land, more about networks, ideas, and influence.” — Joseph Nye

 . . Political Science -II 2020 Political Science -II 2020 Political Science -II 2020 Political Science -II 2020 Political Science -II 2020 Political Science -II 2020 Political Science -II 2020 Political Science -II 2020 Political Science -II 2020 Political Science -II 2020 Political Science -II 2020 

You cannot copy content of this pages.